Thanks.
2011/9/27 Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com
On Tue Sep 27 2011 at 17:32:22 CEST, Issam Harrathi wrote:
and you say here it's cached for 30 seconds?!
Evan said:
and we've discussed implementing it in BIND9, but haven't had time yet.
In other words, they are *not* cached in
I discover that servfail are not cached. is it normal?
explanation:
I have a cache-recursing server and i try www.blabla.com (which exist) and
then i stop the dns server of www.blabla.com. Then (after ttl expired) from
my cache-recusing server i try dig @0 www.blabla.com and i receive a
servfail
I discover that servfail are not cached. is it normal?
Yes, that's normal.
Temporary negative caching of SERVFAIL responses for a limited period (up
to 30 seconds, if I recall correctly) is permitted by the DNS protocol,
and we've discussed implementing it in BIND9, but haven't had time yet
As i test it's not cached at all, and you say here it's cached for 30
seconds?!
i'm using 9.7.2-P3.
2011/9/27 Evan Hunt e...@isc.org
I discover that servfail are not cached. is it normal?
Yes, that's normal.
Temporary negative caching of SERVFAIL responses for a limited period (up
to 30
...@isc.org
I discover that servfail are not cached. is it normal?
Yes, that's normal.
Temporary negative caching of SERVFAIL responses for a limited period (up
to 30 seconds, if I recall correctly) is permitted by the DNS protocol,
and we've discussed implementing it in BIND9, but haven't
On Tue Sep 27 2011 at 17:32:22 CEST, Issam Harrathi wrote:
and you say here it's cached for 30 seconds?!
Evan said:
and we've discussed implementing it in BIND9, but haven't had time yet.
In other words, they are *not* cached in BIND9.
-JP
6 matches
Mail list logo
