Thanks, Phil. This makes perfect sense--unlike TCP, there's nothing
inherent in UDP to make sure that packets come back from the right IP.
Thank you also for explaining this in terms of the socket APIs. This is
something I've only barely touched on--time for me to play around a bit
and
In message cal5w20bysrz5o21eievdgybbg2hum7ydqzfio3cxxo5jzce...@mail.gmail.com
, jagan padhi writes:
Hi,
Is it possible to configure BIND for IPV4 and IPV6 in the same server?
Regards,
Jagan
Yes. listen-on-v6 { any; };
By default it use both IPv4 and IPv6 when recursing.
--
Mark
On 10/19/2012 07:25 PM, John Miller wrote:
Here's a question, however: how does one get probes working for a
transparent LB setup? If an rserver listens for connections on all
interfaces, then probes work fine, but return traffic from the uses the
machine's default IP (not the VIP that was
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS
traffic. So far, I've gotten it working using NAT (each rserver
Hi--
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:25 AM, John Miller wrote:
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS
IMO, the only boxes which should have IPs in both public and private netblocks
should be your firewall/NAT routing boxes.
That's how we usually have our servers set up--the load balancer gets
the public IPs, the servers get the private IPs, and we use NAT to
translate between the two.
On 10/19/12 1:25 PM, John Miller johnm...@brandeis.edu wrote:
Hello everyone,
Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle
Hi--
On Oct 19, 2012, at 1:04 PM, John Miller wrote:
IMO, the only boxes which should have IPs in both public and private
netblocks should be your firewall/NAT routing boxes.
That's how we usually have our servers set up--the load balancer gets the
public IPs, the servers get the private
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
Date: Friday, October 19, 2012 5:09 PM
To: John Miller johnm...@brandeis.edu
Cc: DNS BIND bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: transparent DNS load-balancing with a Cisco ACE
We're on a /16, so we have plenty of public IPs (though
9 matches
Mail list logo
