ben.crosw...@gmail.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: which Name sever is selected?
Message-ID:
cajga8zsug2nrznufuxetbpkvzqkjczzred5u2qxw+uqw0pm...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
RTT banding was removed in early versions of 9.8 due to the performance hit
houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
What's the meaning of bind decaying? Where can I find the detailed
description? Thanks!
There's a summary of the SRTT algorithm in
http://securityintelligence.com/subverting-binds-srtt-algorithm-derandomizing-ns-selection/
Tony.
--
If there is a list of NS records, the local name server uses the RTT (round
trip time) algorithm to find the fatest, and queries that server.
But I found it's not right. In the testing, the local name server doesn't query
the fastest authority name server. Some one tells me that if the local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2014 04:14 PM, houguanghua wrote:
If there is a list of NS records, the local name server uses the
RTT (round trip time) algorithm to find the fatest, and queries
that server. But I found it's not right. In the testing, the local
name
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Georg Kahest georg.kah...@internet.ee wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2014 04:14 PM, houguanghua wrote:
If there is a list of NS records, the local name server uses the
RTT (round trip time) algorithm to find the fatest, and
In article mailman.2368.1393596895.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
If there is a list of NS records, the local name server uses the RTT (round
trip time) algorithm to find the fatest, and queries that server.
But I found it's not right. In the
RTT banding was removed in early versions of 9.8 due to the performance hit
being larger than any security benefit.
So it would depend what version of bind is being used in this case.
https://www.isc.org/blogs/rtt-banding-removal-from-bind-9/
It is important to note that all ns records will take
7 matches
Mail list logo
