forever ago, i set myself up with a solid bandwidth and static IPs and
started to host websites for my friends their small businesses.
basically, they covered the cost of my internet access.
so for 10 years i've been hosting my own name, mail, and web servers
allowing me to '@ A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
Sorry if this is drifting a little from the group topic – if you know
of a better place to post this question, please let me know.
I’m trying to configure a small DHCP internal network, connected to a
router connected to the internet. I want it so that internally, all
DHCP systems are able to
ARM9.5 still mentions manual generation of TSIG data:
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation/arm95#tsig
Is there any advtantage to using -keygen ? ISTR some mention of an
algorithm used to minimize the possibility of collisions. Or is that
true for any key used with HMAC?
Justin
Baird, Josh wrote:
Actually, yes, if you have dynamic DNS registration enabled on the
client/host and server, an 'A' record will automatically be created in
the AD zone.
It needs to be registered in the domain first. Otherwise any system
could mascarade as another system.
Danny
And
Microsoft DNS can work well, HOWEVER much time needs to be spent
understanding its operations.
This is a VERY long winded post, so I hope no one gets upset, I realize this
is not the MS DNS group LOL
I am going to assume, that you are running an Active Directory Domain that
includes
In message 20090206194146.ga24...@norchemlab.com, Justin T Pryzby writes:
ARM9.5 still mentions manual generation of TSIG data:
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation/arm95#tsig
Is there any advtantage to using -keygen ?
It really depends on how you are going to use the
You can not have a CNAME at the domain level. It is against RFC to have a
CNAME and any other data at the same level of a given domain tree.
i.e. the following is illegal
wwwin CNAME www.blah.com
wwwin MX 10 mail.blah.com
This will cause BIND to throw the zone and not load it because it
In message e4b42c39-914d-42be-9488-7ae0eba34...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com,
RJValenta writes:
forever ago, i set myself up with a solid bandwidth and static IPs and
started to host websites for my friends their small businesses.
basically, they covered the cost of my internet access.
so
One example in closing for ya, go try and get an RFC complient Bind server
to respond to a request for name resoloution on a host that has an _
(underscore) in the name, MS allows this, and a zone transfer of this kinda
stuff between and MS Server and a Bind server, can give you MUCH
Certainly doable. I have had this running for some years now. I also
have mail.myself.dk resolving to an internal address if I am on my
internal network and to an external address if I am outside my network.
I use bind with two views and dhcpd for internal addresses updating one
view.
Setup was
Vinny Abello wrote:
Baird, Josh wrote:
Actually, yes, if you have dynamic DNS registration enabled on the
client/host and server, an 'A' record will automatically be created in
the AD zone.
It needs to be registered in the domain first. Otherwise any system
could mascarade as another system.
-Original Message-
From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:32 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices
ForCoexisting
Vinny Abello wrote:
Baird, Josh wrote:
Vinny Abello wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:32 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices
ForCoexisting
Vinny Abello wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 9:57 PM
To: Vinny Abello
Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices
ForCoexisting
Vinny Abello wrote:
-Original
14 matches
Mail list logo
