On 07.07.2009 / 11:55:34 -0400, Rob Payne wrote:
What do you mean by stop? Did the daemon crash, simply not respond
to queries, or something else?
I don't know if this is the same as what Laurence is seeing. Testing
9.6.1 on Solaris 10/sparc, with a local build (THREADS, no MEMFILL,
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
it's possible configure dnssec only between 2 name servers, first is
the authoritative and second is the recurisve? The authoritative name
server would have zones signed and the recursive will do querys and
validation.
Sure, why not?
I personally prefer my setup
Hi,
Can someone tell me how webhosting providers or ISPs do maintenance on their
DNSs?
I mean, can they take it offline? What is the procedure usually?
Thanks,
Alans
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Alans wrote:
Can someone tell me how webhosting providers or ISPs do maintenance on
their DNSs?
I mean, can they take it offline? What is the procedure usually?
You need to define maintenance. With very few exceptions (none?) I
can't think of a reason to take a DNS server off-line to do
I have been thinking of this same issue lately when I had to move a
dns service from one host to another to re-build the OS.
I use virtual IPs on the host making it relatively easy to move the
service around. But as I use Solaris 10 as the platform I am thinking
that Zones would be a
Good day all,
I am looking at making some sweeping changes to some zone files,
cleaning up NS records primarily. As I'm pondering the impact of this,
I got to thinking about how to validate every single record in my
namespace, and therefore the entirety of my change.
What I'm thinking of is a
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for
non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other
Hello,
A few of the default settings changed from 9.4.x to 9.6.x
The appropriate README files, change logs, and BIND ARM will provide details
about them.
Below are some options and logging configurations you may want to investigate.
Ye Ole Disclaimer: Please be sure to understand what these do
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:20:29PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
Is there any reason these flags should not be set by default?
Yes, there is: the code as written uses the NSEC3PARAM record in a
way that, debatably, could be an RFC violation. We're planning to
correct this, and turn the feature
In message 53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com, Bryan
Irvine writes:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
Once upon a time, BIND
10 matches
Mail list logo
