To confirm, this is a local caching also-known-as recursive resolver. It
is quick (< 100 msec) when answering from cache, but not when it has to do
lookups itself (> 1000 msec).
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and
On 12.03.20 11:54, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and network
speed is also good ) . It reply in 1200 msec and 1800 msec (which is very
slow). if it gave Reply by Cache (80 msec or 76 msec).
so i want to know about,
How can i improve my
Hi there,
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and network
speed is also good ) . It reply in 1200 msec and 1800 msec (which is very
slow). if it gave Reply by Cache (80 msec or 76 msec).
so i want to know about,
How can i
Thank you very much sir for replying
we made a recurive resolver (Cent OS 7, 8GB RAM ,250 GB Hard disk and network
speed is also good ) . It reply in 1200 msec and 1800 msec (which is very
slow). if it gave Reply by Cache (80 msec or 76 msec).
so i want to know about,
How can i improve my
4 matches
Mail list logo