On 01.02.22 18:13, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On 1. 2. 2022, at 15:28, Josef Moellers wrote:
Thanks, Ondřej, for pushing my nose onto the fact that the test should be run
as a non-privileged user. BTDTGT
Well, you are welcome, but please **do** include all the modifications and all
the steps
you
On 01.02.22 17:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.02.22 um 15:28 schrieb Josef Moellers:
Just for the record:
Thanks, Ondřej, for pushing my nose onto the fact that the test should
be run as a non-privileged user.
really *nothing* should run as root, especially not building software -
doing
On 2022-02-01 17:59, Danny Mayer via bind-users wrote:
Just run it as a docker image. Docker runs on Windows.
next will be we all run windows 12 in docker :)
/me hiddes, i am still using gentoo
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC
> On 1. 2. 2022, at 15:28, Josef Moellers wrote:
>
> Thanks, Ondřej, for pushing my nose onto the fact that the test should be run
> as a non-privileged user. BTDTGT
Well, you are welcome, but please **do** include all the modifications and all
the steps
you are doing when reporting bugs.
Check the list archives beginning April 2021 for the thread:
Deprecating BIND 9.18+ on Windows (or making it community improved and
supported)
--
Do things because you should, not just because you can.
John Thurston907-465-8591
john.thurs...@alaska.gov
Department of Administration
On 2/1/22 11:14 AM, jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote:
Just read from the 9.18.0 release notes that Windows is not supported.
Since don't remember reading expressly stated that Windows support
would end with 9.16.x branch, inquiring if there is more information
about future Windows compatibility
Am 01.02.22 um 15:28 schrieb Josef Moellers:
Just for the record:
Thanks, Ondřej, for pushing my nose onto the fact that the test should
be run as a non-privileged user.
really *nothing* should run as root, especially not building software -
doing so and even rpmbuild no longer can assure
On 02.02.22 00:14, jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi wrote:
Just read from the 9.18.0 release notes that Windows is not supported.
Since don't remember reading expressly stated that Windows support
would end with 9.16.x branch, inquiring if there is more information
about future Windows compatibility
Just read from the 9.18.0 release notes that Windows is not supported.
Since don't remember reading expressly stated that Windows support would
end with 9.16.x branch, inquiring if there is more information about
future Windows compatibility available... is the plan to include support
to
On 01. 02. 22 15:43, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On 01/02/2022 15:33, Petr Špaček wrote:
Hi Petr,
As you correctly noticed, the log message "adjusted limit on open
files from 4096 to 1048576" already shows that BIND adjusted OS-level
file descriptor limit.
The only way out is what Tony wrote in
Please don’t, use gitlab. The message is just autoconf quirk.
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 1. 2. 2022, at 15:28, Josef Moellers wrote:
>
> PS The
On 01/02/2022 15:33, Petr Špaček wrote:
Hi Petr,
As you correctly noticed, the log message "adjusted limit on open files
from 4096 to 1048576" already shows that BIND adjusted OS-level file
descriptor limit.
The only way out is what Tony wrote in another thread: Add "-S "
parameter to bump
On 01. 02. 22 13:30, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Do you recommend setting LimitNOFILE=1048576 in the systemd unit file
for BIND?
I'm not Ondrej, but let me try:
No, that would be redundant.
As you correctly noticed, the log message "adjusted limit on open files
from 4096 to 1048576"
Hi folks,
Just for the record:
Thanks, Ondřej, for pushing my nose onto the fact that the test should
be run as a non-privileged user. BTDTGT
As I am determined (and it makes sense) to run the tests on the binaries
that we will eventually ship, I need to build the software according to
our
Hi Ondrej,
Do you recommend setting LimitNOFILE=1048576 in the systemd unit file
for BIND?
Regards,
Anand
On 28/01/2022 15:03, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
It is 1024. I see named logging this:
adjusted limit on open files from 4096 to 1048576
I thought there was no need to set
On 31. 01. 22 11:50, Tony Finch wrote:
2. Should sendmail not be trusting the AD bit in replies from the admin
configured (i.e., trusted by admin) resolvers?
It's dangerous territory. Sendmail isn't alone: for example, OpenSSH also
relies on the AD bit to validate SSHFP records. But using AD is
On 28. 01. 22 16:28, Tony Finch wrote:
Anand Buddhdev wrote:
The server has many IP addresses. In named.conf, there are 129 IPv6 addresses
in the "listen-on-v6" option and 128 IPv4 addresses in the "listen-on" option.
The server begins running, but then repeatedly emits this log:
general:
On 31.01.22 21:24, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:36:28PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
This works:
$ mkdir /tmp/bind9
$ cd /tmp/bind9
$ curl -sSLO https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.18.0/bind-9.18.0.tar.xz
$ tar -xJf bind-9.18.0.tar.xz
$ cd bind-9.18.0/
$ ./configure
$ make -j
A
18 matches
Mail list logo
