severity dynamic not behaving as expected

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
Hello (again), I was reviewing my logging configuration, implementing new categories and generally reorganizing stuff. From what I remember and from what I read in the documentation, using "severity dynamic" on a channel should result in logging being disabled for that channel as long as

Re: Splitting long strings in RRs using parentheses

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-05-2022 15:27, Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users wrote: A semicolon begins a comment in a zone file [1], so yes. -JP [1] https://jpmens.net/2015/10/28/the-semicolon-in-zone-master-files-some-history/ Thank you, JP. Nice blog post. Very enlightening. On 26-05-2022 15:29, Bjørn Mork

Re: Splitting long strings in RRs using parentheses

2022-05-26 Thread Bjørn Mork
Sandro writes: > The bit from the first semicolon to the end of the line was missing. > > Is that expected behavior? I couldn't find any documentation regarding > the usage of parentheses. The master file format is mostly defined by RFC1035. See

Re: Splitting long strings in RRs using parentheses

2022-05-26 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
20220317-a4qe._domainkeyTXT ( v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAA ^ begin comment OCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAmEsWuQCj+OenaSQ3dM6WItExor The bit from the first semicolon to the end of the line was missing. Is that expected behavior? A semicolon begins a

Splitting long strings in RRs using parentheses

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
Hello, While adding a DKIM key to my zone I was looking for information about using parentheses for working around the string length limitation. I looked at the way BIND puts them in my zone file for RRSIG entries and and applied that to the TXT record: 20220317-a4qe._domainkeyTXT (

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-05-2022 12:00, Sandro wrote: Thank you, Matthijs, for pointing out the bug. Do you have any suggestion for what to try first, key separation or policy separation? Well, I went for key separation. Let's see if it sticks. Last time I restarted BIND everything seemed fine in the beginning

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-05-2022 11:05, Sandro wrote: I'll take a look at the bug report in a minute. Well, there are similarities between #2463 and my setup, but also differences. In my case, all zones are signed, internal and external. I have one dnssec-policy defined in the options section, which is a

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
26-May-2022 10:06:14.458 debug 3: zone penguinpee.nl/IN/external: zone_rekey failure: unexpected error (retry in 600 seconds) One of the first things BIND does, if I'm reading lib/dns/zone.c correctly, is to attempt to lock the keys, and if it fails it emits that diagnostic. Assuming the

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 23-05-2022 16:12, Sandro wrote: I'll do some more digging through the log files. I meanwhile increased the severity to 'debug 3' for dnssec_debug. I'm having some issues again. Not as severe as last time, since the RRSIG records are all still within their validity period. However, bind

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Sandro
On 26-05-2022 10:34, Matthijs Mekking wrote: What version are you using? We had a bug with dnssec-policy and views (#2463), but that has been fixed. I'm using BIND 9.16.28-RH on Fedora Server. I'll take a look at the bug report in a minute. Since 9.16.18 you should not be able to set the

Re: bugs for cname can not be working properly with bind 9.11.4

2022-05-26 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
(putting this back on list) thank you for the feedback,now I have already start the slave server [root@bind-master-centos7 ~]# dig kaixinduole.com +nssearch SOA ns1.kaixinduole.com. shawn.kaixinduole.com. 2022041566 3600 900 604800 86400 from server 52.130.145.30 in 0 ms. SOA

Re: bugs for cname can not be working properly with bind 9.11.4

2022-05-26 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
2. [image: image.png] In this screenshot you've shown the result of `cat named.conf', but where's the zone definition for kaixinduole.com? What we are seeing here is a recursive server. -JP -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC

Re: Primary zone not fully maintained by BIND

2022-05-26 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Sandro, What version are you using? We had a bug with dnssec-policy and views (#2463), but that has been fixed. Since 9.16.18 you should not be able to set the same key-directory for the same zone in different views. Matthijs On 23-05-2022 16:12, Sandro wrote: On 23-05-2022 15:48, Tony

Re: BIND9 TSIG from Windows Server 2016 DNS Server Zone

2022-05-26 Thread Crist Clark
As far as I know, GSS-TSIG is only used for DNS updates, not zone transfers. https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9_16_5/advanced.html#dynamic-update Sorry, don't know what capabilities AD has for securing zone transfers beyond IP ACLs, which of course is not much security at all. I've never had