Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-13 Thread Maurício Penteado via bind-users
Hi folks, I have finally resolved my issue with docker interface.I had to delete my Ubuntu and install a brand new Centos on my server.Now everything works as expected. Cheers Em sábado, 7 de maio de 2022 06:23:32 GMT+1, Nick Tait via bind-users escreveu: On 7/05/2022 1:38 am, MaurÃ

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-06 Thread Nick Tait via bind-users
On 7/05/2022 1:38 am, Maurà cio Penteado via bind-users wrote: I added the A-record "ns1  IN  A  172.17.0.1" to my zone-file as suggested and it seems that the order fixed the issue. Now my Bind9 clients are getting ip 192.168.0.10 favorably. Hi Mauricio. I don't think anyone suggested that

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-06 Thread Maurício Penteado via bind-users
I just message you and the problem happened again ...  C:\Users\Mauricioλ ping ns1.example.lan Pinging ns1.example.lan [172.17.0.1] with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 84.116.236.63: Destination net unreachable.Reply from 84.116.236.63: Destination net unreachable.Reply from 84.116.236.63:

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-06 Thread Maurício Penteado via bind-users
Hi folks, Thank you for the reply. I added the A-record "ns1  IN  A  172.17.0.1" to my zone-file as suggested and it seems that the order fixed the issue.Now my Bind9 clients are getting ip 192.168.0.10 favorably. Anyway, I'd like to eliminate ip 172.17.0.1 from name resolutions.I never added

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Nick Tait via bind-users
On 6/05/2022 7:51 am, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote: On my Bind9 server, I have the following zone-files: forward.example.lan.db: ns1     IN      A           192.168.0.10 ns1     IN          fe80::f21f:afff:fe5d:be90 I don't see the 2nd, Docker (?), address; 172.17.0.1, in the zone. 

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 5/5/22 1:35 PM, Maurà cio Penteado via bind-users wrote: Hi folks, Hi, Thank you for the reply. :-) Unfortunately, I did not understand how I am supposed to add multiple A-records for the same name to the zone-file to fix this issue. Based on your first message, you already have

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Maurício Penteado via bind-users
Hi folks,  Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, I did not understand how I am supposed to add multiple A-records  for the same name to the zone-file to fix this issue. On my Bind9 server, I have the following zone-files: - - - forward.example.lan.db: $TTL    604800@       IN      SOA     

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 5/5/22 9:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: by not add multiple A-records for the same name to the zone-file BIND don't know about docker on it's own Another option would be to leverage BIND's ability to sort A records based on configured preference (in the config file, not the zone file) based

Re: Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.05.22 um 16:05 schrieb Maurà cio Penteado via bind-users: What is the current behavior? Nslookup from a DNS Client workstation  should not get docker0 ip addrees of the Bind9 Server PC. |nslookup ns1.example.lan Server: UnKnown Address: fe80::f21f:afff:fe5d:be90 Name:

Bind9 Server conflicts with docker0 interface

2022-05-05 Thread Maurício Penteado via bind-users
Summary Docker0 interface is being resolved and DNS Clients cannot deal with the address. BIND version used BIND 9.18.1-1ubuntu1-Ubuntu (Stable Release) Steps to reproduce On a fresh Ubuntu 22.04 Server install and set Bind9 up. After that install docker. What is the current behavior?