Dan Mahoney wrote on 12/05/2012 06:52:43 PM:
I can't even imagine what spamfilters would think of such an address. :)
To quotes some annoying TV ads here in the US:
REJECTED!
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or
Karl Auer wrote on 12/05/2012 06:44:01 PM:
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
THe SPF query is looking for the sender's domain, not the sender's server,
so the record would
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote:
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
Well, most mail servers will reject such a server (i.e. one with NO rdns).
However, there's another
In article mailman.818.1354751059.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
Many anti-spam rules block mail
In message alpine.bsf.2.00.1212052345240.58...@bikeshed.isc.org, Dan Mahoney w
rites:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Karl Auer wrote:
This may be a silly question, but are SPF records supposed to be
supported in reverse zones? I'm thinking of a mail server that has no
entry in the DNS.
Well,
6 matches
Mail list logo
