On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:20PM -0400, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to talk a bit about my view on the relation between the Bitcoin
Core project, and the consensus rules of Bitcoin.
I believe it is the responsibility of the maintainers/developers of Bitcoin
https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc
Thanks for the triggering warning, if not for that I may have gone into
seizures.
e
On 07/27/2015 10:05 AM, Alice Larson via bitcoin-dev wrote:
The twitter teenage nonsense from Todd is ridiculous:
https://twitter.com/playatodd (warning, triggering)
Thomas,
I think this is interesting and has some good thoughts behind it. For
clarity, are you recommending that the _oa2 portion of the domain name be
hidden as a way to make it easier to delegate just wallet names from a
zone?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Thomas Voegtlin via
There are several reasons why we rejected doing it this way with OpenAlias:
1. It adds complexity for the alias creator. This may seem
unimportant, but the OpenAlias standard was created to empower people
to create their own aliases as simply as possible, not to make it
overly complex.
2. It's
Eric Voskuil, Alice Larson, others:
Personal attacks or bullying of any kind are not tolerated on this mailing list.
This list is meant to be a low-volume community for technical proposals and
discussion regarding Bitcoin. See the archive for say, 2012, for example.
What Peter Todd or anyone
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Kalle Rosenbaum via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
These BIPs have been assigned 120 and 121:
Did you break open the bubbly? From the outside it certainly looked harder
than everything else about this proposal combined.
