Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

2015-10-01 12:15 GMT+02:00 Wladimir J. van der Laan : > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:10:45PM +0200, Marcel Jamin wrote: > > I think the question has already been answered for you by the companies > > that build on top of it, the investments being made and the $3.5 billion > >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 > I've said the same thing years ago. Originally the "1.0" was a target for whenever "client mode" as planned by Satoshi

[bitcoin-dev] Scheduling refactors (was Re: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule)

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > 2015-11-01 > --- > - Open Transifex translations for 0.12 > - Soft translation string freeze (no large or unnecessary changes) > - Finalize and close translation for

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!

On 9/30/2015 10:58 AM, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I don't think we need to wait for you to understand the advantages of > softforks to move forward with BIP65, just like we didn't need to wait > for every developer and user to understand BIP66 to deploy it. What a bad example. BIP66

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Crossing the line? [Was: Re: Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!]

To reduce the list noise level, drama level and promote inclusion, my own personal preference (list admin hat: off, community member hat: on) is for temporal bans based on temporal circumstances. Default to pro-forgiveness. Also, focus on disruption of the list as a metric, rather than focusing

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Crossing the line? [Was: Re: Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!]

Given the current reddit hubbub, a bit of a cooling off period is IMO advisable before taking any further action. 2. If so, does the community feel that Mike Hearn has crossed it? (I personally feel he has. Multiple times.) I don't believe any posting by Mr. Hearn warrants any actions

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

On Thursday, October 01, 2015 9:41:25 AM Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 > > I'd say it's safe to say that it's used in production. But it's not *ready* to be used in production. :( For 1.0, I would expect:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!

Or, you know, enter some discussions on what exactly are the issues that SPV clients face during soft forks and see if anything can be done (on all sides) to mitigate the risks. Crazy stuff, I know Š ;-) From: NotMike Hearn via bitcoin-dev Reply-To:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Versionbits BIP (009) minor revision proposal.

Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev writes: > Gregory Maxwell writes: >> I can, however, argue it the other way (and probably have in the >> past): The bit is easily checked by thin clients, so thin clients >> could use it to reject

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!

On 28 September 2015 at 06:48, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev wrote: > There is no consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It will > result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV wallets will > become less reliable during the

[bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

-- Forwarded message -- From: Marcel Jamin Date: 2015-10-01 11:39 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule To: Btc Drak I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 I'd say it's safe to say

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Marcel Jamin wrote: > I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0 I'll interpret the question as "why is the Bitcoin Core software still <1.0.0". Bitcoin the currency doesn't have a version, the block/transaction versions are at v3/v1

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:57:42PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: > On Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:25:56 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan via > bitcoin-dev wrote: > > 2015-12-01 > > --- > > - Feature freeze > > Where is "Consensus freeze"? Shouldn't this be put off until after the HK >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

Any particular reason bitcoin versioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec? 2015-10-01 10:50 GMT+02:00 Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:57:42PM +, Luke Dashjr wrote: > > On Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:25:56 AM

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Any particular reason bitcoin versioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec? > We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance releases are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates