[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.10.3 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Bitcoin Core version 0.10.3 is now available from: This is a new minor version release, bringing security fixes and translation updates. Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed list moderation policy and conduct

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Another point building on Justus's remarks that I'll make (below) Justus Ranvier via bitcoin-dev: > On 14/10/15 19:02, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> *Disclose potential conflicts* >> >> 1. List discussions often involve interested

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - We need more usecases to motivate the change

Mark, You seemed interested in changing BIP 68 to use 16 bits for sequence number in both the block and time versions, making time based sequence numbers have a resolution of 512 seconds. I'm in favor of this approach because it leaves aside 14 bits for further soft forks within the semantics of

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - We need more usecases to motivate the change

Btc Drak writes: > Alex, > > I am sorry for not communicating more clearly. Mark and I discussed your > concerns from the last meeting and he made the change. The BIP text still > needs to be updated, but the discussed change was added to the PR, albeit > squashed making it

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - We need more usecases to motivate the change

Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev writes: >>From a practical perspective: yuck. There's currently no way to play > with bitcoind's perception of time, so that's a very long sleep to > blackbox test (which is what my lightning test script does). > > So consider

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - We need more usecases to motivate the change

Alex, I am sorry for not communicating more clearly. Mark and I discussed your concerns from the last meeting and he made the change. The BIP text still needs to be updated, but the discussed change was added to the PR, albeit squashed making it more non-obvious. BIP68 now explicitly uses 16 bits

Re: [bitcoin-dev] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - We need more usecases to motivate the change

Adam, there is really no justification I can see to lower the interblock interval on the Bitcoin blockchain, primarily due to the effects of network latency. Lowering the interblock interval and raising the block size are not equal alternatives - you can always get more throughput in bitcoin by

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin-NG whitepaper.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, and thanks for the reply. I don't think you are missing anything, I'll continue to observe this thread for further details and developments on NG generally, security, & privacy. Ittay: > Hi Odinn, > > I guess to answer we should separate