Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware wallets and "advanced" Bitcoin features

Good Morning Kevin, > Inputs (mainly for pre-signed Tx): > == > Problem: Poisoned inputs are a major risk for HW as they don't know the > UTXO set. While this can be exploited for fee > attacks, it is a bigger threat to pre-signed transactions

[bitcoin-dev] Hardware wallets and "advanced" Bitcoin features

Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion on improving Hardware Wallets. My approach to this right now is from a vault protocol we are developing (Revault, [1]), and its Hardware Wallet requirements. I started working on a Github Issue in our repo [2], other people recommended us to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] New PSBT version proposal

On 1/7/21 7:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > Andrew Chow writes: >> Hi Rusty, >> >> On 1/6/21 6:26 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: >>> Hi Andrew et al, >>> >>> Very excited to see this progress; thanks for doing all the >>> work! Sorry for the delayed feedback, I didn't get to this before the

[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 0.21.0 Release Notes Bitcoin Core version 0.21.0 is now available from: Or through BitTorrent:

[bitcoin-core-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 0.21.0 Release Notes Bitcoin Core version 0.21.0 is now available from: Or through BitTorrent: