Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - addrv2 message

2019-03-06 Thread Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev
Concept ACK. > ==Considerations== > > (to be discussed) > > * ''Client MAY store and gossip address formats that they do not know > about'': does it ever make sense to gossip addresses outside a certain > overlay network? Say, I2P addresses to Tor? I'm not sure. Especially for > networks

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - addrv2 message

2019-03-06 Thread Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:22 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Field addr has a variable length, with a maximum of 32 bytes > (256 bits). Clients SHOULD reject > longer addresses. Is 32 bytes long enough for I2P? It seems like there are two formats, is there a reason we

[bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - addrv2 message

2019-03-05 Thread Wladimir J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev
See https://gist.github.com/laanwj/4fe8470881d7b9499eedc48dc9ef1ad1 for formatted version, Look under "Considerations" for topics that might still need to be discussed. BIP: ??? Layer: Peer Services Title: addrv2 message Author: Wladimir J. van der Laan Comments-Summary: No comments