Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

wa...@aol.com;>hurricanewa...@aol.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 7:46 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship One last comment here on this topic; For anybody who wants to discuss decentralized communication mechanisms in

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is >relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate. >Please can you take this discussion elsewhere. Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard recently that discussing Bitcoin split is off topic and must be

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, NxtChg wrote: >>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is >>relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate. >>Please can you take this discussion elsewhere. > > Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

>I am creating a de-centralized forum, and I mean truly decentralized as I nor >anyone else will be able to control it. Zander is working on the same thing: https://www.reddit.com/r/AetheralResearch/ But it's actually quite difficult to make it truly censorship-resistant: both in solving the

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

are and everyone else can > do whatever they want. > > > -Original Message- > From: NxtChg <nxt...@hush.com> > To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewa...@aol.com>; bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 4:45 am > S

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

>...so people posting to it will always have a venue to speak without being >censored. So is the attacker, who aims to make the place unusable. ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

- From: NxtChg <nxt...@hush.com> To: hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewa...@aol.com>; bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 4:45 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship >I am creating a de-centralized forum, and I mean truly decentralized

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:03:33PM -0500, sisadm101--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > is from a one sided point of view? There doesn't seem to be a solution at > this time, but I find it dissapointing that many (in this very email list) Please, this has drifted so far from the goal of this list:

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

One last comment here on this topic; For anybody who wants to discuss decentralized communication mechanisms in general, they can come to www.reddit.com/r/p2pcomms (up until these decentralized forums have become stable and common). I've seen quite a few more of these projects lately, I want to

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

g <nxt...@hush.com> Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; hurricanewarn1 <hurricanewa...@aol.com> Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 7:46 am Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship One last comment here on this topic; For anybody who wants to discuss decentralized

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

This is off-topic here. Consensus critical changes (those aren't changes that Bitcoin Core developers can make unilaterally against the will of alternative implementations or users) and Bitcoin Core development are independent from bitcointalk.org and /r/bitcoin. And as you say, people can create

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship

I am not sure that this is on-topic for the bitcoin-dev mailing list, but it seems politically relevant enough that I'm going to respond. /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk.org are both discussion websites that pertain to a specific topic. All (or nearly all) discussion websites pertaining to a specific