Hi Daryl,
I think the reason nobody has done that is that BIP70 isn't really that
much work. It's basically just certs inside a protobuf, with a bit of extra
data. I'm not sure yet another way to do the same thing is worth much.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Daryl Banttari dbantt...@gmail.com
On 4/2/2014 9:08 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
At first, this is a poor choice of URL.
But it really looks like a phishing attempt that no one should visit.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote:
I've sat on this for some time after starting this. I have forked
On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people are
getting the 'domain for sale' but whoever is the target probably gets
something special?
On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/2/2014
www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665
Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at http://bgp.he.net/AS53665
They probably have a dedi or VPS at Cogent. They didn't even create an IRR
record for their AS or their only route.
Let's see what google has to say about malware
Kevin,
the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your project?
2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm guessing most people
are getting the 'domain for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2014 03:41 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
www.githubb.com resolves to addresses announced by AS53665
Some basic info about AS53665 can be seen at
http://bgp.he.net/AS53665 They probably have a dedi or VPS at
Cogent. They didn't even create
On 4/2/2014 11:45 AM, Ricardo Filipe wrote:
Kevin,
the thing is you gave us a bad link... what is the correct URL of your
project?
2014-04-02 16:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin kevinsisco61...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/2014 11:13 AM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
Maybe this site serves up exploits selectively? I'm
Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments:
https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1
--
Jud
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com (http://github.com) and the link
was a mistake.
Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com and the link was a mistake.
http://news.nurse.com/article/20121203/NY02/112030026#.Uzw5UVy2uw8
I think it's possible that 'Kevin' is for real and maybe he doesn't realize he
linked to a phishing site, if it was an accident. If this is the same person,
On 4/2/2014 12:55 PM, Jud wrote:
Looks like Kevin was probably trying to point us to his fork for comments:
https://github.com/kjsisco/bitcoin/tree/patch-1
--
Jud
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
Maybe he has a fork on the real github.com http://github.com and
10 matches
Mail list logo
