-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03.05.2014 02:54, Ben Davenport wrote:
No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at
least in the US is currency-symbolamountmodifier, i.e. $63k
or $3M.
As you said, that's in the US, and I strongly suspect the sole reason
Am 2014-04-26 22:17, schrieb Mike Hearn:
Bitcoin is not a vendor, so I doubt that would work.
By my interpretation of RFC 6838, the Bitcoin Foundation or even Gavin
himself could register a vendor tree for Bitcoin. In the case of the
foundation registering, getting the subtree named vdn.bitcoin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.04.2014 14:15, Mike Hearn wrote:
Beyond needing to double balances, what if the shop is selling me a
phone on contract? So the actual cost of the phone is lower than
the real price on the assumption of future revenue. Alice double
spends
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I agree that a unit based on 1e-6 BTC is easier to use in practice
than BTC. The name microbitcoin is ok-ish. Nearly all countries
officially use the SI-system, but that doesn't mean that the average
citizen knows all the SI prefixes. Mega, kilo and
4 matches
Mail list logo