Are you really that pig headed that you are going to try and blow up the
entire system just to get your way? A bunch of ignorant redditors do not
make consensus, mercifully.
On 2015-05-29 12:39, Gavin Andresen wrote:
What do other people think?
If we can't come to an agreement soon, then
So if the server pushes new block
header candidates to clients, then the problem boils down to increasing
bandwidth of the servers to achieve a tenfold increase in work
distribution.
Most Stratum pools already do multiple updates of the header every block
period,
bandwidth is really
On 2015-05-11 10:34, Peter Todd wrote:
How do you see that blacklisting actually being done?
Same way ghash.io was banned from the network when used Finney attacks
against BetCoin Dice.
As Andreas Antonopoulos says, if any of the miners do anything bad, we
just ban them from mining. Any sort of
On 2015-05-11 16:28, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
My problem is that this seems to lacks a vision. If the maximal block
size is increased only to buy time, or because some people think that 7
tps is not enough to compete with VISA, then I guess it would be
healthier to try and develop off-chain
4 matches
Mail list logo
