On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Isidor Zeuner
cryptocurrenc...@quidecco.de wrote:
A possible approach to handle this issue would be to add a randomized
offset amount to the payment amount. This offset amount can be small
in comparison to the payment amount.
Any thoughts?
Adding/subtracting
Yes. You can certainly add additional inputs and outputs -- and as such
you can increase privacy and defrag your wallet at the same time.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Isidor Zeuner
cryptocurrenc...@quidecco.de wrote:
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/06/2015 03:08 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Yes. You can certainly add additional inputs and outputs -- and as
such you can increase privacy and defrag your wallet at the same
time.
A lot could be done to make regular spends resemble CoinJoin
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Isidor Zeuner
cryptocurrenc...@quidecco.de wrote:
Hi there,
traditionally, the Bitcoin client strives to hide which output
addresses are change addresses going back to the payer. However,
especially with today's dynamically calculated miner fees, this
may
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Isidor Zeuner wrote:
Hi there,
traditionally, the Bitcoin client strives to hide which output
addresses are change addresses going back to the payer. However,
especially with today's dynamically calculated miner fees, this
may often be ineffective:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/04/2015 02:23 PM, Isidor Zeuner wrote:
Hi there,
traditionally, the Bitcoin client strives to hide which output
addresses are change addresses going back to the payer. However,
especially with today's dynamically calculated miner fees,
Hi there,
traditionally, the Bitcoin client strives to hide which output
addresses are change addresses going back to the payer. However,
especially with today's dynamically calculated miner fees, this
may often be ineffective:
A user sending a payment using the Bitcoin client will usually enter
7 matches
Mail list logo
