On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Thomas Voegtlin thoma...@gmx.de wrote:
Perhaps the only thing that needs to be standardized is the order of
public keys in the redeem script: I think they should be sorted, so that
the p2sh address does not depend on the order of pubkeys.
Yes. That solution is
I'm not sure I understand why you need any special structure for this at
all. The way I'd do it is just use regular HD wallets for everyone, of the
regular form, and then swap the watching keys. Why do people need to be
given a cosigner index at all, given that they all have unique root keys
Le 26/04/2014 11:43, Mike Hearn a écrit :
I'm not sure I understand why you need any special structure for this at
all. The way I'd do it is just use regular HD wallets for everyone, of the
regular form, and then swap the watching keys. Why do people need to be
given a cosigner index at all,
On Apr 26, 2014 6:43 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
I'm not sure I understand why you need any special structure for this at
all. The way I'd do it is just use regular HD wallets for everyone, of the
regular form, and then swap the watching keys. Why do people need to be
given a cosigner
Let's assume we use one shared branch for everyone. Then two cosigners
could need a new receiving address at the same time, and get the next
unused address on that branch.
This is the part I struggle to understand. There is no shared branch
because each user/cosigner has their own unique seed
On 04/26/2014 04:33 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
Let's assume we use one shared branch for everyone. Then two
cosigners could need a new receiving address at the same time, and
get the next unused address on that branch.
This is the part I struggle to understand. There is no shared
Ah, I see now. Thanks. And actually now I re-read it, Manuel's explanation
was clear, it just didn't sink in for some reason.
--
Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
Build your Enterprise Intranet with
I will just chime in that I've been working on a similar spec for Armory
to implement P2SH multisig and I came up with basically an identical
scheme. I think you covered most of what is needed. The one thing I
did differently was try to match the BIP 32 structure, by keeping the
original 3
8 matches
Mail list logo
