-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083961.0
I have no response from Peter Todd back on it other than my time is
better spent focusing on more fundemental
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:26:07AM -0700, odinn wrote:
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083961.0
I have no response from Peter Todd back on it other than my time is
better spent focusing on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter, my response below
On 06/16/2015 10:46 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:26:07AM -0700, odinn wrote:
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2015 02:53 PM, Brian Deery wrote:
1. There will be a 1:1 relationship between a payment code owner
and their identity. Presumably the payment code would be strongly
and publicly tied to the identity. This makes the notification
address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The notification transactions are a pain point when it comes to
privacy, and yet they must exist in order to to ensure that nobody can
lose their money as long as they back up their wallet seed.
They could be treated as a backup, however, that
Hi Justus:
CC'ing mailing list because more bloom filter and HD wallet experts there
can chime in for some of these thoughts. I refined some ideas we went over
earlier.
Here are some critiques/worries about the payment codes.
With identities explicitly tied to a payment code, bloom filter
1. There will be a 1:1 relationship between a payment code owner and their
identity.
Bear in mind, the spec defines identity to mean:
*Identity is a particular extended public/private key pair. *
So that's not quite what is meant normally by identity. It's not a
government / real name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2015 04:46 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
So that's not quite what is meant normally by identity. It's not a
government / real name identity or an email address or phone number
kind of identity.
I expect that mappings would begin to develop
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Justus Ranvier
justus.ranv...@monetas.net wrote:
https://github.com/justusranvier/rfc/blob/payment_code/bips/bip-pc01.mediawiki
This link contains an RFC for a new type of Bitcoin address called a
payment code
Payment codes are SPV-friendly alternatives to
9 matches
Mail list logo
