This is the next big lets all agree to do things the same way thing
I think we should tackle. I'm particularly looking for feedback from
other bitcoin client developers, even if it is just a quick looks
reasonable, if everybody else is going to do it then I will
(eventually) too...
Thanks to
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:16:03 PM Mike Hearn wrote:
They could be included as well of course, but from a seller
perspective the most important thing is consistency. You have to be
able to predict what CAs the user has,
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:32:46 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Obviously the state of the world with browsers is not that good... but
in our own UAs we can do better and get closer to that.
This effectively centralizes Bitcoin (at least in the eyes of many) and even
if each competing client
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the next big lets all agree to do things the same way thing
I think we should tackle. I'm particularly looking for feedback from
other bitcoin client developers, even if it is just a quick looks
reasonable,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Walter Stanish wal...@stani.sh wrote:
X-ISO4217-A3
I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there
a reason for this?
It also doesn't appear to address ~any of the the targeted items here.
Is there another draft I should be looking for
X-ISO4217-A3
I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there
a reason for this?
Of the three currently published proposals, all are essentially IANA
registry proposals.
We are currently working with IETF staff, with open offers of support
from multiple well funded
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Walter Stanish wal...@stani.sh wrote:
X-ISO4217-A3
I see that draft-stanish-x-iso4217-a3 is not standards track, is there
a reason for this?
Of the three currently published proposals, all are essentially IANA
registry proposals.
We are currently working
We are not establishing an IETF working group, which is an option that
was explored prior to the Paris meeting and has been sidelined at
present for depth-of-bureaucracy by the backing commercial entities.
Rather, we are establishing a top-level IANA registry group. This is
not anticipated by
8 matches
Mail list logo
