Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin addresses -- opaque or not

2013-06-22 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 11 June 2013 17:29, Luke-Jr l...@dashjr.org wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:11:33 PM Melvin Carvalho wrote: For the sake of argument let's say that opaque means that you can tell nothing about the address by examining the characters. This is true or false based on CONTEXT.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting

2013-06-22 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 10 June 2013 06:09, John Dillon john.dillon...@googlemail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 It has been suggested that we leave the decision of what the blocksize to be entirely up to miners. However this leaves a parameter that affects every Bitcoin participant

[Bitcoin-development] bitcoind and C++ namespaces?

2013-06-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Slowly warming to C++ namespaces. How about starting small, and wrapping most stuff inside a bitcoin namespace? Bike shedding can be done at any point; the main idea is to start small, and gain experience. -- Jeff Garzik Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc.