Modern Java versions let you bundle the app with a stripped down JVM. I
don't know if Jim does that, but I think it's an obvious step towards
making MultiBit friendlier and easier to use.
BTW I believe most secure browsers (Chrome, Firefox) have banned the applet
plugin or severely restrained it
on 07/09/2013 06:56 AM Jim said the following:
+ it will bump up the MultiBit download from about 11MB to 30-40MB
(I think). This drops the maximum copies of MultiBit the multibit.org
server can deliver per day from around 90,000 to 30,000ish.
The multibit.org server maxes out at 1 TB of
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Daniel F nanot...@gmail.com wrote:
on 07/09/2013 06:56 AM Jim said the following:
+ it will bump up the MultiBit download from about 11MB to 30-40MB
(I think). This drops the maximum copies of MultiBit the multibit.org
server can deliver per day from around
For those interested in these things the multibit.org server
is a dedicated server hosted by the German company
http://www.server4you.net.
It is physically located in the delightful city of Strasbourg,
just on the French side of the French German border.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013, at 03:28 PM,
on 07/09/2013 10:28 AM Mike Hearn said the following:
SourceForge has a horrible UI and blocks some countries. It also exposes
us to a large and potentially hackable mirror network. Whilst we're not
bandwidth constrained on our own servers, let's try and keep using them.
the point was just
That's true - we could serve new users off our own servers and auto updates
off SF.net mirrors, potentially.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel F nanot...@gmail.com wrote:
on 07/09/2013 10:28 AM Mike Hearn said the following:
SourceForge has a horrible UI and blocks some countries. It
What about something like Cloudflare? Transparent to most and it'd help with
your bandwidth issues.
Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
That's true - we could serve new users off our own servers and auto
updates
off SF.net mirrors, potentially.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel F
Not any more than sourceforge or github.. None of these solutions are
replacements, but rather only supplements to self hosted files.
Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Nick Simpson n...@mynicknet.com
wrote:
What about something like Cloudflare? Transparent
That's good to know. Still, at the moment we'd need to dramatically
increase the download size and increase Bitcoin usage by 10x to hit our
limits. It'd be a good problem to have.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Johnathan Corgan
johnat...@corganlabs.comwrote:
On 07/09/2013 08:32 AM, Nick
It particulary worries me that a lot of sites hand over their SSL
private keys to Cloudflare, and they are located in prism land.
Cloudflare is rapidly becoming a bitcoin community SPOF.
--
See everything from the
10 matches
Mail list logo
