Before F2Pool's launch, I performed probably the only successful
bitcoin double spend in the March 2013 fork without any mining power.
[ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.0 ] I know how bad
the full RBF is. We are going to switch to FSS RBF in a few hours.
Sorry.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015
Hello. We recognize the problem. We will switch to FSS RBF soon. Thanks.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Stephen Morse
stephencalebmo...@gmail.com wrote:
It is disappointing that F2Pool would enable full RBF when the safe
alternative, first-seen-safe RBF, is also available, especially since
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Adrian Macneil adr...@coinbase.com wrote:
However, we do rely pretty heavily on zeroconf transactions for merchant
processing, so if any significant portion of the mining pools started
running your unsafe RBF patch, then we would probably need to look into this
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
Whilst it would be nice if miners in China can carry on forever regardless
of their internet situation, nobody has any inherent right to mine if they
can't do the job - if miners in China can't get the trivial amounts of
to be adopted. We should increase the limit and
increase it now. 20MB is simply too big and too risky, sometimes we
need compromise and push things forward. I agree with any solution
lower than 10MB in its first two years.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Chun Wang 1240...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1
Hello. I am from F2Pool. We are currently mining the biggest blocks on
the network. So far top 100 biggest bitcoin blocks are all from us. We
do support bigger blocks and sooner rather than later. But we cannot
handle 20 MB blocks right now. I know most blocks would not be 20 MB
over night. But
6 matches
Mail list logo
