On 4/28/2013 8:55 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:48:18AM +, John Dillon wrote:
We can build this stuff incrementally I'll agree. It won't be the case that
one
in a thousand nodes serve up the part of the chain you need overnight. So
many
I am over engineering the
On 4/9/2013 4:09 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
hack by changing the protocol. Nodes can serve up blocks encrypted under a
random key. You only get the key when you finish the download. A blacklist
NAK
Makes bringing up a new node dependent
My first concern was that I and about everyone else only has TCP/UDP
port forwarding, but at least for the first:
UDT uses UDP to transfer bulk data with its own reliability control and
congestion control mechanisms. Multiple UDT flows can share a single UDP
port, thus a firewall can open only
On 3/12/2013 5:18 AM, Jorge Timón wrote:
A related question...some people mentioned yesterday on #bitcoin-dev
that 0.5 appeared to be compatible with 0.8.
Was that only for the fatal block and would have forked 0.8 later
too or is it something else?
I'm having a hard time understanding this
4 matches
Mail list logo
