Re: [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors

2014-03-02 Thread Mike Hearn
I'm hoping I can convince Saivann to do a bit of graphics work for this at some point :-) Something like a green stamp that appears (like a watermark) in the background, might be good. On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Jeremy Spilman jer...@taplink.co wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:26:57 -0800,

[Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors

2014-02-28 Thread Jeremy Spilman
We currently have subtle positive feedback of a signed payment request in the form of the green background. Unsigned requests simply show up without the green background, as well as requests which provide a certificate but have a missing or invalid signature. There's a open bug (#3628) and

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors

2014-02-28 Thread Wladimir
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Spilman jer...@taplink.co wrote: There's a open bug (#3628) and pull request (#3684) to provide negative feedback (yellow background) for a missing or invalid signature, but it seems like there's some debate on whether bitcoind should do that... The

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Positive and negative feedback on certificate validation errors

2014-02-28 Thread Jeremy Spilman
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:26:57 -0800, Wladimir laa...@gmail.com wrote:Such a thing would be interesting for a future BIP standard. I see one problem here: for an unsigned payment request there isn't really an "origin". Browser URI handlers don't send the referrer either.Yeah, good point. If you