On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
Hi Mike
Well thank you for replying openly on this topic, its helpful.
I apologise in advance if this gets quite to the point and at times
blunt, but transparency is important, and we owe it to the users who
see Bitcoin
On 2015-06-16 07:55, Aaron Voisine wrote:
Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow.
Who
would provide the nodes they would need connect to?
The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function.
How will the SPV wallet users pay for this service?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:33:31PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
Dear Adam, All:
At the community's convenience, it would be an honour to arrange an initial
open summit to meet with representatives of the Chinese miners in
Another thing worth mentioning is that an SPV wallet cannot validate a
PoP without fetching the input transactions of the PoP from an
external (not bitcoin network) source, for example chain.com or some
other trusted full node's API.
The validation of the PoP depends on the external source(s)
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:33:31PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
Dear Adam, All:
At the community's convenience, it would be an honour to arrange an
Thank you for the clarification Tom!
/Kalle
2015-06-16 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding t...@thinlink.com:
On 6/16/2015 5:12 AM, Kalle Rosenbaum wrote:
2015-06-16 7:26 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding t...@thinlink.com:
Kalle goes to some trouble to describe how merchants need to ensure that
they only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083961.0
I have no response from Peter Todd back on it other than my time is
better spent focusing on more fundemental
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Peter Todd p...@petertodd.org wrote:
Merge-mined sidechains are not a scaling solution any more than SPV is a
scaling solution because they don't solve the scaling problem for
miners.
Some kind of treechain like sidechain / subchains where what part of the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:26:07AM -0700, odinn wrote:
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1083961.0
I have no response from Peter Todd back on it other than my time is
better spent focusing on
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:15:14PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Pieter Wuille pieter.wui...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's simple: either you care about validation, and you must validate
everything, or you don't, and you don't validate anything. Sidechains do
not
I don't see why existing software could create a 40-byte OP_RETURN but not
larger? The limitation comes from a relay policy in full nodes, not a
limitation is wallet software... and PoPs are not relayed on the network.
Regarding sharing, I think you're talking about a different use case. Say
you
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Mark Friedenbach m...@friedenbach.org wrote:
Given that we have had more than two weeks of public discussion, code is
available and reviewed, and several community identified issues resolved, I
would like to formally request a BIP number be assigned for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter, my response below
On 06/16/2015 10:46 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:26:07AM -0700, odinn wrote:
This is very well done.
Have you seen this discussion that I started regarding BIP 63?
Please no GoogleGroups. Stick with mailman or some other open
source thing you can move around from place to place as needed.
Also, online third party archives die, their web interfaces suck
ass, they're bloated, don't export, aren't offline capable or
authoritative, etc.
You need to make the
On Jun 15, 2015 11:43 PM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Though Peter Todd's more general best-effort language might make more
sense. It's not like you can hide an OP_RETURN transaction to make it
look like something else, so that transaction not going to be
distinguished by
Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
would provide the nodes they would need connect to?
The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function.
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:28 PM,
Hi Bryan,
Specifically, when Adam mentioned your conversations with non-technical
people, he did not mean Mike has talked with people who have possibly not
made pull requests to Bitcoin Core, so therefore Mike is a non-programmer.
Yes, my comment was prickly and grumpy. No surprises, I did
How do you plan to deal with security incident response for the
duration you describe where you will have control while you are deploying
the unilateral hard-fork and being in sole maintainership control?
How do we plan to deal with security incident response - exactly the same
way as
18 matches
Mail list logo
