[Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements

2014-10-17 Thread Andy Schroder
and suggestions would be greatly appreciated. -- Andy Schroder signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements

2015-02-05 Thread Andy Schroder
established practically and it would be awesome if they could be managed over bluetooth as well. Maybe more improvements to the payment protocol can simultaneously result (and also extended to bluetooth) that embrace the establishment of micropayment channels. Andy Schroder On 10/17/2014 03:58 PM

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-28 Thread Andy Schroder
that the e-mail list finally forwarded them through the other day. Now for Eric's e-mail... More below. On 02/24/2015 09:09 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:50 PM, Andy Schroder wrote: We can change resource to Session ID if you want. I think the URL scheme should

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Schroder
you said a new public key for each tap, do you see that as every single tap, or do you consider multiple taps from the same customer the same tap? Andy Schroder On 02/24/2015 06:28 AM, Eric Voskuil wrote: On 02/23/2015 09:53 PM, Andy Schroder wrote: I was saying provide a public key via

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Schroder
Andy Schroder On 02/23/2015 10:09 AM, Jan Vornberger wrote: Hey! On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Andy Schroder wrote: It's maybe not a bad idea for the wallet to try all payment_url mechanisms in parallel. Should we add this as a recommendation to wallets in TBIP75? It doesn't

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-25 Thread Andy Schroder
compatibility. Andy Schroder On 02/24/2015 05:14 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: * Add a s= parameter that uses a unique public key for each session. This public key identifies the payee to the payer and payer to the payee. This would be the simple model, which just tacks on another parameter

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-22 Thread Andy Schroder
bluetooth, then a lot of my concerns about the message header inconsistencies will go away and the connection will also be secure. We don't have to reinvent anything. Andy Schroder On 02/22/2015 02:08 PM, Jan Vornberger wrote: Hi everyone, I am working on a Bitcoin point of sale terminal based

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-22 Thread Andy Schroder
Andy Schroder On 02/22/2015 06:06 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: On 02/22/2015 02:37 PM, Andy Schroder wrote: I'd like to see some discussion too about securing the bluetooth connection. Right now it is possible for an eavesdropper to monitor the data transferred. Yes, this should be a prerequisite

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback

2015-02-22 Thread Andy Schroder
Andy Schroder On 02/22/2015 05:48 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: One correction inline below. e On 02/22/2015 02:39 PM, Eric Voskuil wrote: Hi Jan, This is really nice work. WRT the Schroder and Schildbach proposal, the generalization of the r and payment_url parameters makes sense, with only

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?

2015-06-10 Thread Andy Schroder
Andy Schroder On 06/10/2015 03:20 PM, Peter Todd wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote: Andy Schroder On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote: 4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because the list server slightly modifies them

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?

2015-06-10 Thread Andy Schroder
with non plain text data. Andy Schroder On 06/10/2015 03:43 PM, Peter Todd wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:36:42PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote: It's possible that the enigmail extension is not working right, but I was under the impression that it is just feeding data to gpg and then receiving