On 6/19/2015 6:43 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
No surprise, the position of Blockstream employees is that hard forks
must never happen and that everyone's ordinary transactions should go
via some new network that doesn't yet exist.
If my company were working on spiffy new ideas that required a hard
Hi Adam,
I am still confused about whether you actually support an increase in the
block size limit to happen right now. As you agree that this layer 2 you
speak of doesn't exist yet, and won't within the next 10-12 months (do you
agree that actually?), can you please state clearly that you will
IPv4 came before IPv6…you pick up on things quickly :)
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:48 AM, Marcel Jamin mar...@jamin.net wrote:
At the risk of stating cliches, the Mac came before the Windows PC…Yahoo!
came before Google…MySpace came before Facebook…
And TCP/IP came before... oh wait...
On Jun 19, 2015, at 3:45 AM, Dr Adam Back a...@cypherspace.org
mailto:a...@cypherspace.org wrote:
That wont be good for the companies either, but they may not see that
until they've killed it, many companies operate on a1 or 2 year
time-horizon. They may say screw layer2, I have a runway
- Did you accept payment from companies to lobby for 20MB blocks? Do
you consider that something appropriate to publicly disclose if so? Do
you consider that user rights should come above or below company
interests in Bitcoin? FWIW on pondering that last question should user
rights come above
5 matches
Mail list logo
