[blfs-dev] Certificate Authorities Certificates

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Three points: First one, I could do, but the other ones, I would prefer, either is a too important decision or it is too big for me, but if necessary, can try. 1. Minor one, but noticed it, yesterday: In the book, cleaning: rm -r certs BLFS-ca-bundle* However, certdata.txt is left. Is it

Re: [blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: All 5 VMs finished. They run with 4 CPU's, are i686. Two, as I said before, 1GB RAM, running in other host, 3 have 1.5GB, running on this host that have many other things, including

Re: [blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-22 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 21-08-2013 19:18, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Did not know if sending here, to lfs -dev or to blfs -support. 1. Happened with lfs-7.2,7.3 (both svn) and now with 7.4-rc1. ... as host), after logout and umount, had to reboot the system $ grep tty /etc/group

Re: [blfs-dev] Certificate Authorities Certificates

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Three points: First one, I could do, but the other ones, I would prefer, either is a too important decision or it is too big for me, but if necessary, can try. 1. Minor one, but noticed it, yesterday: In the book, cleaning: rm -r certs BLFS-ca-bundle*

Re: [blfs-dev] Two difficulties (one in all versions)

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Note too that when we are doing a copy from a browser, that it needs to remove html, so it may be a browser issue. It was not a big deal, but was worth mentioning. Now, I have better understanding; before, it was a mystery. Again, perhaps, a comment or note

Re: [blfs-dev] SBUs - was Re: #3982: Firefox-23.0.1/Xulrunner-23.0.1

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:45:03AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu: I will write down things that I think. I may be wrong, so, please tell me, if I am. SBU is good, necessary. SBU can never be trusted completely. Can never be accurate. This host

[blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't seem to have a fix. This looks as if something in the 3.10.x stable series broke it. Error is - In file included from process.c:66:0:

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't seem to have a fix. This looks as if something in the

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 22.8.2013 20:42, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't seem to have a fix.

[blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' This should be /usr/lib/libattr.la. I don't see what is making this line. The obvious fix is to run a

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' This should be /usr/lib/libattr.la. I don't see what is making this line. The

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/22/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' This should be /usr/lib/libattr.la. I

Re: [blfs-dev] acl

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: On 08/22/2013 10:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I just ran into a minor problem, but can't figure out how to best fix it in the book. acl installs /usr/lib/libacl.la. This file has the line: dependency_libs=' /usr/usr/lib/libattr.la' This should be

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: krejzi Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 New Revision: 11672 Log: minor acl fixes. Modified: trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/attr.xml amp; -chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/libattr.so.1.1.0 amp;amp; +chmod -v

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/22/2013 10:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: krejzi Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 New Revision: 11672 Log: minor acl fixes. Modified: trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/attr.xml amp; -chmod -v 755

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/22/2013 01:42:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:06:44PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: On 08/22/2013 04:39 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: Just a note that strace-4.8 doesn't build with the current kernel headers. Noted on the strace list on 13th August, but they don't seem to

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r11672 - trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: On 08/22/2013 10:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: krejzi Date: Thu Aug 22 13:45:41 2013 New Revision: 11672 Log: minor acl fixes. Modified: trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/acl.xml trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/attr.xml

Re: [blfs-dev] strace

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:10:58PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: I also built strace-4.8 fine against linux-3.10, but did so under uClibc. I think it's a glibc problem - it's acquired something that was already in the kernel headers. But I may well have misunderstood. I'm puzzled that the

[blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/23/2013 12:40 AM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: bdubbs Date: Thu Aug 22 15:40:33 2013 New Revision: 11674 Log: Update to gnupg-2.0.21. Can we make this one default and ditch 1.x version? Arch has done that too. Requires symlinks for gpgv and gpg to respective gpgv2

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: On 08/23/2013 12:40 AM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: bdubbs Date: Thu Aug 22 15:40:33 2013 New Revision: 11674 Log: Update to gnupg-2.0.21. Can we make this one default and ditch 1.x version? Arch has done that too. Requires symlinks for gpgv and gpg

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/23/2013 01:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: That's OK with me. A quick check shows perl-modules, seahorse, gcr, mutt, mitkrb, and gpgme referencing gunpg. If they can use gnupg2 instead, then we can remove it. However, it is still being maintained. The last update was less than a

Re: [blfs-dev] GnuPG

2013-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01:12:52AM +0200, Armin K. wrote: GNOME Stuff (seahorse, gcr) and gpgme works fine with 2.x version. mitkrb uses it only for key verification which should work fine. Dunno about mutt, but it works just fine with Thunderbird and engimail. I have to admit that I gave

[blfs-dev] lvm2

2013-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I am trying to update lvm2 and am running into a bit of trouble with the tests. The configure and make complete with out issue. I did a make install to a DESTDIR and that was OK too. The problem is 'make check'. If I run as a normal user, all the tests fail with what looks like permission