Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
All 5 VMs finished. They run with 4 CPU's, are i686. Two, as I said
before, 1GB RAM, running in other host, 3 have 1.5GB, running on this
host that have many other things, including
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:45:03AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 21-08-2013 19:48, Ken Moffat escreveu:
I will write down things that I think. I may be wrong, so, please tell
me, if I am.
SBU is good, necessary. SBU can never be trusted completely. Can never
be accurate. This host
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 01:49:17PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
All 5 VMs finished. They run with 4 CPU's, are i686. Two, as I said
before, 1GB RAM, running in other host, 3 have 1.5GB, running on this
host that have many other things, including FF and TB, running as well.
In the
Ken Moffat wrote:
This is prompted by my LFS-7.4 build on i686. The host was LFS-7.2
and a single-threaded initial SBU was 78.392 seconds (whoot! fast!).
But one of the first things I do on a new system is remove /tools,
recreate an empty /tools, and run the SBU commands as root. Usually
