Re: guile 2.0.3

2011-11-18 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
On 18/11/11 22:00, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Bruce, The checksum does not match the gz file. I assume you meant to include the xz file in the url? Regards, Wayne. Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring. Should libunistring be a required dependancy? Wayne. --

Re: guile 2.0.3

2011-11-18 Thread Andrew Benton
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:56:34 +1100 Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote: Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring. Should libunistring be a required dependancy? Do you mean without libunistring? Guile-2.0.3 builds fine with libunistring-0.9.3 installed here. ldd shows

Re: guile 2.0.3

2011-11-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Bruce, The checksum does not match the gz file. I assume you meant to include the xz file in the url? Yes, I'll fix it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: guile 2.0.3

2011-11-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:56:34 +1100 Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote: Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring. Should libunistring be a required dependancy? Do you mean without libunistring? Guile-2.0.3 builds fine with libunistring-0.9.3

Re: guile 2.0.3

2011-11-18 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
On 19/11/11 01:39, Andrew Benton wrote: On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:56:34 +1100 Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote: Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring. Should libunistring be a required dependancy? Do you mean without libunistring? Guile-2.0.3 builds fine with

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/11/05 10:35 CST: Hi all, I would like to move the Guile instructions to what I feel is a more proper category, the Programming section. A bit more research digs up this from the Guile info pages: The Guile Reference Manual **

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/11/05 10:35 CST: Hi all, I would like to move the Guile instructions to what I feel is a more proper category, the Programming section. Since there is a command interpreter, I agree. I'm not familiar with guile or scheme, but a

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 11 de Abril de 2005 19:23, Bruce Dubbs escribió: I propose to reorganize these as the following: A similar propossal is at my TODO for when in can start to doing real work in BLFS as editor ;-) Then, I agree. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886:

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/11/05 12:23 CST: Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 04/11/05 10:35 CST: I would like to move the Guile instructions to what I feel is a more proper category, the Programming section. Since there is a command interpreter, I agree. I'm not familiar with guile

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/11/05 12:23 CST: excerpt from: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2004-June/006401.html Sounds like we are in violent agreement. I'll try to do the reorg tonight. -- Bruce --

Re: Guile

2005-04-11 Thread Archaic
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:20:24PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Sounds like we are in violent agreement. uhh. So does that mean we get to see a fight, or what?!?! ;) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch