Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

2012-10-21 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Bruce, Still about version, I believe you know, but just in case, I do some things more to check the plugin version. Since version 7u7 (maybe even before), some of the tests I used stopped working for OpenJDK and IcedTeaWeb, but still work for jre. So, something has been (intentionally?) changed

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

2012-10-21 Thread DJ Lucas
On 10/20/2012 02:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: BTW, what do we call this version. It's icedtea-2.3.3, but the build says: java version 1.7.0_0 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b36) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode) Right now we are calling the

[blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin, The book has been updated to use gnome-system-log-3.6.1.tar.xz and gucharmap-3.6.1.tar.xz, but neither are available at the gnome web site. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the

Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Armin K.
On 10/21/2012 06:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin, The book has been updated to use gnome-system-log-3.6.1.tar.xz and gucharmap-3.6.1.tar.xz, but neither are available at the gnome web site. -- Bruce Whoops. It should be gnome-system-monitor-3.6.1 and gucharmap-3.6.0 --

Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: On 10/21/2012 06:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin, The book has been updated to use gnome-system-log-3.6.1.tar.xz and gucharmap-3.6.1.tar.xz, but neither are available at the gnome web site. Whoops. It should be gnome-system-monitor-3.6.1 and gucharmap-3.6.0 OK, the

[blfs-dev] docbook-xsl-1.77.1 instructions

2012-10-21 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
Hi All, The following instruction creates a file called docbook-xsl-1.77.1 rather than a directory. install -v -m644 -D README \ /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1 Should in not be: install -v -m644 -D README \ /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1/README.XSL

Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Armin K.
Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao: OK, the files repo is now up-to-date. -- Bruce I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove the following tarballs from anduin's blfs directory:

Re: [blfs-dev] docbook-xsl-1.77.1 instructions

2012-10-21 Thread Armin K.
Dana 21.10.2012 22:37, Wayne Blaszczyk je napisao: Hi All, The following instruction creates a file called docbook-xsl-1.77.1 rather than a directory. install -v -m644 -D README \ /usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1 Should in not be: install -v -m644 -D README \

Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Randy McMurchy
On 10/21/2012 5:21 PM, Armin K. wrote: Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao: OK, the files repo is now up-to-date. -- Bruce I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove the following

Re: [blfs-dev] Missing Gnome Files

2012-10-21 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: Dana 21.10.2012 20:04, Bruce Dubbs je napisao: OK, the files repo is now up-to-date. -- Bruce I took a look at anduin's blfs hieararchy and found lot of packages there that are not in the book anymore. If you desire, you can remove the following tarballs from anduin's