Robert Connolly wrote these words on 04/26/05 14:41 CST:
On April 26, 2005 03:13 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Because I'm not sure what lfs-unstable is now, could you tell us
what version of GCC you're using. I've compiled the JDK-1.5.0
several times on 3 different x86 platforms using GCC-3.4.3
Hello.
It appears that autofs has released a new version (4.1.4) and have
subsequently moved the 4.1.3 package to the
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/autofs/v4/old directory
breaking the links on the stable and daily snapshot versions.
I created a bug report for this
DJ Lucas wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40937
And yes the doublefree patch works. But I forgot to update the build
size and times...so guess what?!?! Yes another complete @$%^%$ build.
;-) Update coming soon. Robert, you might want to put that patch in
place as
BTW, the md5sum from the blfs repo and anduin for
OOo_1.1.4-jdk_1.5.0_fix-1.patch do not match. The date/timestamp in the diff
is different, that's all.
robert
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Robert Connolly wrote:
BTW, the md5sum from the blfs repo and anduin for
OOo_1.1.4-jdk_1.5.0_fix-1.patch do not match. The date/timestamp in the diff
is different, that's all.
robert
On it. Thanks for all the assistance. :-)
-- DJ Lucas
--
Robert Connolly wrote:
On April 27, 2005 12:20 am, DJ Lucas wrote:
Robert, please also see the thread 'OpenOffice bug in BZ' for
an additional patch.
I found openoffice.org-1.9.69.doublefree.patch and renamed it to
OOo_1.1.4-doublefree.patch so the blfs instructions should work with it.
