Updated BLFS to JDK-1.5.0.11 source and binary.
Some notes:
I listed the source download urls as it appears they are freely
available without acknowloging a license agreement. Apparently,
the license in the code is enough. You still must click on a
link to agree to the binary download
Hi there
That part:
If your X Window System is installed in any prefix other than /usr/X11R6,
adjust as necessary and execute the following command:
find . -type f -exec sed -i 's@/usr/X11R6@/usr@g' {} \;
is quite confusing. Maybe it should rather be: If your X Window System is
installed in
Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
Hi there
That part:
If your X Window System is installed in any prefix other than /usr/X11R6,
adjust as necessary and execute the following command:
find . -type f -exec sed -i 's@/usr/X11R6@/usr@g' {} \;
is quite confusing. Maybe it should rather be: If your
Thus spoke DJ Lucas:
NO..your are completely right! :-) Rereading the OP, I had thought your
interpretation of 'prefix' was incorrect until a few seconds ago. Now,
what to do to make it more clear for others that will read it in the
future? I think replacing '/usr' with 'PREFIX' in the
Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
Yes, that would be clear ;-)
Simon
Cool. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Jeremy Byron wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Snip
/usr/src/jdk-build/control/build/linux-i586/tmp/sun/com.sun.java.util.jar.pack/u
npack-cmd/obj/main.o: In function `.L93':
main.cpp:(.text+0xd1c): undefined reference to `gunzip::init(unpacker*)'
main.cpp:(.text+0xd2e): undefined reference to
DJ Lucas wrote:
Snip
/usr/src/jdk-build/control/build/linux-i586/tmp/sun/com.sun.java.util.jar.pack/u
npack-cmd/obj/main.o: In function `.L93':
main.cpp:(.text+0xd1c): undefined reference to `gunzip::init(unpacker*)'
main.cpp:(.text+0xd2e): undefined reference to `gunzip::start(int)'
collect2:
Matthew Burgess:
I *think* this was a bug in tar-1.15. Upgrading to 1.15.1 should allow
jdk-1.5.0 to install correctly - I didn't have any problems with that
version anyway.
The ChangeLog says that 1.15 had problems untarring from standard input.
Just tried with 1.15.1, and everything's
Hans-Joachim Widmaier wrote:
Sorry for the german locale. The tar error is This doesn't look like a tar
archive,
Skipping to next header.
It took me some time to figure out that the culprit was tar-1.15.
I *think* this was a bug in tar-1.15. Upgrading to 1.15.1 should allow
jdk-1.5.0
Hello all,
Found mismatched quotes in the jdk.sh line 17.
CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:.:${AUTO_CLASSPATH_DIR}
change to
CLASSPATH=${CLASSPATH}:.:${AUTO_CLASSPATH_DIR}
user will notice errors when /etc/profile is sourced.
bash: /etc/profile.d/jdk.sh: line 22: unexpected EOF while looking for
Robert Connolly wrote these words on 04/26/05 14:41 CST:
On April 26, 2005 03:13 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Because I'm not sure what lfs-unstable is now, could you tell us
what version of GCC you're using. I've compiled the JDK-1.5.0
several times on 3 different x86 platforms using GCC-3.4.3
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/17/05 22:55 CST:
Okay guys, fop appears to be good now and blfs.pdf looks good. I'm
reworking the OOo to install the large jdk-1.5 patch, and testing again.
Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
still exists. Anyone have any
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/18/05 21:38 CST:
Speaking of OO, I have a minor issue. While waiting for your update, I
went ahead and installed a binary version.
With all due respect, and with the utmost consideration for your issue,
how does this fit into a -dev issue?
Problems with a
DJ Lucas wrote:
Also checking berkelydb now since I had no idea whether the problem
still exists.
Just checking back, but no change necessary to db except that passing
LIBSO_LIBS and LIBXSO_LIBS to make is no longer necessary.
-- DJ Lucas
--
Okay it works...and startup time is considerably faster, though I've
changed some build options from what is in the book. Which brings me to
a couple of quick questions.
jdk-1.5.0: The sed works, with about 150 or so javac warnings. Thanks
to Ximian's 64 bit build of OOo-1.1.4, there are jdk
15 matches
Mail list logo
