DJ Lucas wrote:
Okay guys, I'm stumped. I have a day old build of current unstable.
/uar/share/applications/*.desktop files exist. XDG_DATA_DIR is set
(/usr/share).
Is XDG_CONFIG_DIRS set to point to wherever gnome-menus has installed it's
config files?
--
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:47 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Okay guys, I'm stumped. I have a day old build of current unstable.
/uar/share/applications/*.desktop files exist. XDG_DATA_DIR is set
(/usr/share).
Is XDG_CONFIG_DIRS set to point to wherever gnome-menus has
Hi.
To cope with the junk mail of my windows dependent computer nerd son, I
have the following recipe in .procmailrc
:0
* ^To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This fails if the mail is also addressed to me. An example is this
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He will get it,
Stef Bon wrote:
Hello,
in the development of LFS the bootscripts are enhanced. The bootscripts for
BLFS are not compatible anymore with LFS-bootscripts-3.2.1.
How are they not compatible?
The version the latest BLFS-bootscripts are compatible with are the
LFS-bootscripts-2.2.1.
Could the
Declan Moriarty wrote:
http://www.tv3.ie
I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they?
Works for me
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050508 Firefox/1.0+
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
Declan Moriarty schrieb:
http://www.tv3.ie
I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they?
Works fine here with Firefox 1.0.4, Windows XP. (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows;
U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4)
Not tested on linux because of lacking X server. ;-)
Andrew Benton wrote:
Stef Bon wrote:
Hello,
in the development of LFS the bootscripts are enhanced. The bootscripts
for BLFS are not compatible anymore with LFS-bootscripts-3.2.1.
How are they not compatible?
The version the latest BLFS-bootscripts are compatible with are the
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
http://www.tv3.ie
I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they?
If it actually crashes, it's a bad plugin (I get the stuff telling me
something is required to see the bit at the top). Interestingly,
konqueror-3.4 displays i without
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:05 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
http://www.tv3.ie
I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they?
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
Fails for me. I believe this is a java problem, there are a few sites
like this, that bomb not only
Ken Moffat wrote:
http://www.tv3.ie
If it actually crashes, it's a bad plugin (I get the stuff telling me
something is required to see the bit at the top). Interestingly,
konqueror-3.4 displays i without reference to any missing plugins).
The text is too small to read, of course, but
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 05/25/05 00:35 CST:
Givin a guess, I like this
one 'GLib-GObject-CRITICAL' of what is going on in the background, but
I've no idea.
(gnome-panel:27132): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion
`object-ref_count 0' failed
(nautilus:27134):
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Ken Moffat wrote:
http://www.tv3.ie
If it actually crashes, it's a bad plugin (I get the stuff telling
me something is required to see the bit at the top).
Interestingly, konqueror-3.4 displays i without reference to any
missing
Simon Geard wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:47 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Okay guys, I'm stumped. I have a day old build of current unstable.
/uar/share/applications/*.desktop files exist. XDG_DATA_DIR is set
(/usr/share).
Is XDG_CONFIG_DIRS set to point to wherever
Randy McMurchy wrote:
/uar/share/applications/*.desktop files exist. XDG_DATA_DIR is set
(/usr/share). Taking advice from a post on gnome list, rebuilt
gnome-session and then gnome-panel. No change. No fam or tcp-wrappers,
otherwise, all optional deps have been met. Givin a guess, I like
14 matches
Mail list logo
