Base system: HLFS-Glibc-SVN-20060220 + BLFS-SVN-20060404
Some important packages installed:
GCC-3.4.5
Glibc-2.3.6
Glib-2.10.1
cairo-1.0.4
Pango-1.12.0
LibTIFF-3.8.2
libjpeg-6b
GTK+-2.8.16
I've been struggling with Firefox for a few days now, and could really
need some pointers. I've followed
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:52 +0100, Alan Lord wrote:
Like I said it might be completely wrong, but something to keep you
going until the states wakes up!!!
History has shown you to be right about 95% of the time when you have
a segfaulting Firefox. Misconfigured fonts.
--
Randy
rmlinux:
On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:08 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I believe the patch should be applied with `patch -Np1', but you might
need -Np0. Anyway, please let me know if this helps your situation.
Hour by hour I'm liking Bruce's original
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:41 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
The solution is that we need to stick with the packages the developers
say are for Xorg-7.0 unless there is a security flaw or serious bug
release made. Bumping up the major version from fixesproto-3.0.2 to
fixesproto-4.0 without
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:41:05AM -0700:
On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:08 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
The problem is this: this newly released tarballs are slated for Xorg
7.1. Read this post by the developer of
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:02 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Also Dan i think it's good idea for every module to has its own page and
with the right order.
A single page is getting unreadable and in my humble opinion might be
confusing.
I must admit to not looking into the Xorg 7.0 stuff yet. I just
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:09:14AM -0500:
So, that said, how many modules are you speaking of Ag?
Lets see,and if we go with the right order and without to count the
Mesa/libdrm must be 10,the following.
proto
util
lib
xbitmaps
app
data
font
luit
xorg-server
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
I also want to object to pull out the Xorg-7 from the book.
Is exactly the same code with 6.9.0.
What we can do,is to publish an official list with the right
versions and stick with them,thus will make the support more easily.
Pulling out
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:40:46AM -0500:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release
here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many
reports) that the 7.0 build
Hi
X compiled beautifully... and fluxbox is up and running... everything
is uber-responsive...
...just trying to get xfce up and running... however... i keep getting
errors that gtk+2.8.16 won't work because the PKG_CONFIG_PATH may be
wrong or th BASE_DEPENDENCIES variable is not set.. it
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 23:44 +0530, Faheem Mohammed wrote:
...just trying to get xfce up and running... however... i keep getting
errors that gtk+2.8.16 won't work because the PKG_CONFIG_PATH may be
wrong or th BASE_DEPENDENCIES variable is not set.. it complains it
cannot find atk, pango,
Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
Thus spoke Tor Olav Stava:
I've gone through the fonts configurations, but still can't get Firefox
to run. For reference I'm using Xorg-6.8.2 following the HLFS
instructions.
Do you get the whole list of all the fonts when you run fc-list?
Simon
I
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:44:48PM +0530, Faheem Mohammed wrote:
...just trying to get xfce up and running... however... i keep getting
errors that gtk+2.8.16 won't work because the PKG_CONFIG_PATH may be
wrong or th BASE_DEPENDENCIES variable is not set.. it complains it
cannot find atk,
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 4/7/06, Tor Olav Stava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# firefox
/usr/lib/firefox-1.5.0.1/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 27354 Segmentation
fault $prog ${1+$@}
First, let's turn up the verbosity of run-mozilla.sh to see where it's
crashing. I
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 07:47 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Potentially, this is the xorg-server problem brought up on blfs-dev
since it seems to affect gtk2 apps.
I can say it is safe to eliminate this possibility. I just built up
an LFS-SVN system (060322) using
On 4/7/06, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally, I would suggest that you should export PKG_CONFIG_PATH so
that it includes the directory where the .pc files from these packages
are installed. The only directory pkgconfig knows about automatically
is /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
and
Thus spoke Tor Olav Stava:
I installed some extra TTF fonts to see if it could have any effect on
the problems, but no.. So now fc-list gave me a huge list of garbled
ttf-fonts. I cleaned out the extra fonts I installed, and now fc-list
gives me this:
Luxi Serif:style=Regular
Luxi
On 4/7/06, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally, I would suggest that you should export PKG_CONFIG_PATH so
that it includes the directory where the .pc files from these packages
are installed. The only directory pkgconfig knows about automatically
is /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
and
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:30 -0700, Henry christenson wrote:
Dont forgot if X is installed its path too.
We are talking about the directories that are native to pkg-config. Ones
it knows about by default and not from PKG_CONFIG_PATH.
A separate X directory other than /usr/lib/pkgconfig would
Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
Thus spoke Tor Olav Stava:
I installed some extra TTF fonts to see if it could have any effect on
the problems, but no.. So now fc-list gave me a huge list of garbled
ttf-fonts. I cleaned out the extra fonts I installed, and now fc-list
gives me this:
Luxi
Thus spoke Dan Nicholson:
No, this is totally untrue. We actually just committed a bunch of
changes so this wouldn't happen anymore. The only fonts Fontconfig
needs are the TTF ones installed with X. Right now, this is
accomplished with two symlinks:
Oops, I missed that... sorry.
Simon
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:30:52PM -0700, Henry christenson wrote:
and /usr/share/pkgconfig.
--
Dan
Dont forgot if X is installed its path too.
/usr/X11R6/share/pkgconfig (at least i think not on linux box at the
moment.)
No, that's the whole point. I'll believe Dan about
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 4/7/06, Simon Scheiwiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your /etc/fonts/local.conf looks fine, so I don't know why the other fonts
are missing. Make sure you have the fonts for 100dpi, 75dpi, misc and so
on installed. If they are found by Fontconfig, your Firefox will
On 4/7/06, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, that's the whole point. I'll believe Dan about
/usr/share/pkgconfig, he's got a lot more detailed experience than I
have (and it saves me wondering _why_ I'd got stuff there), but
anywhere else will be unknown to pkgconfig, whether it's
On 4/7/06, Tor Olav Stava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity. Are those OTF fonts new as of Xorg 6.9/7.0? I've
never seen them in the Xorg-6.8.2 install.
I tried creating that symlink to the TTF fonts, but Firefox still
wouldn't run..
I don't know when the OTF fonts were added,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:08:39PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
This came up some months back, and I'm not going to dig up the link,
but there's some logic behind /usr/lib/pkgconfig vs.
/usr/share/pkgconfig. System-independent packages (like iso-codes,
which just carries data) should install
Hello
I installed Apache 2.2 and PHP 5.1.2, but can't run a single script. It
doesn't work with other scripts either, so it seems to be more an apache
problem than one of php. For example, when I try to run
http://localhost/cgi-bin/printenv or http://localhost/cgi-bin/test-cgi, I
get a 500
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 23:49 +0200, Simon Scheiwiller wrote:
What could be the problem here?
I wish I could help you Simon, but I haven't a clue. However, this might
be helpful. It should work. I have several systems with Apache-2.2 on it
that can run cgi scripts just fine. For example, they
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release
here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many
reports) that the 7.0 build instructions are confusing and need to
be broken up. If
29 matches
Mail list logo
