On 4/9/06, Johannes Lächele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried uninstalling the xfixes-proto-4.0 and the composite-proto-03
packages and installing the older ones instead, after that I rebuilt the
xorg-server but I still get the same errors after running startx.
If you've installed
On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:08 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I believe the patch should be applied with `patch -Np1', but you might
need -Np0. Anyway, please let me know if this helps your situation.
Hour by hour I'm liking Bruce's original
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:41 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
The solution is that we need to stick with the packages the developers
say are for Xorg-7.0 unless there is a security flaw or serious bug
release made. Bumping up the major version from fixesproto-3.0.2 to
fixesproto-4.0 without
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:41:05AM -0700:
On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:08 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
The problem is this: this newly released tarballs are slated for Xorg
7.1. Read this post by the developer of
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:02 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Also Dan i think it's good idea for every module to has its own page and
with the right order.
A single page is getting unreadable and in my humble opinion might be
confusing.
I must admit to not looking into the Xorg 7.0 stuff yet. I just
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:09:14AM -0500:
So, that said, how many modules are you speaking of Ag?
Lets see,and if we go with the right order and without to count the
Mesa/libdrm must be 10,the following.
proto
util
lib
xbitmaps
app
data
font
luit
xorg-server
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
I also want to object to pull out the Xorg-7 from the book.
Is exactly the same code with 6.9.0.
What we can do,is to publish an official list with the right
versions and stick with them,thus will make the support more easily.
Pulling out
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:40:46AM -0500:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release
here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many
reports) that the 7.0 build
Randy McMurchy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release
here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many
reports) that the 7.0 build instructions are confusing and need to
be broken up. If
Hi Everyone
I have completed building GNOME 2.12.2 without any errors (which is
quite surprising for me :-)
but after running startx I get 2 Problems:
1. Fonts:
I can see the fancy new splash-screen for about 2 seconds before X.org
shuts down because it couldnt find any Fonts in
On 4/6/06, Johannes Lächele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Fonts:
I can see the fancy new splash-screen for about 2 seconds before X.org
shuts down because it couldnt find any Fonts in
dir/usr/share/fonts/dir which is the standard-dir
I can solve this problem with adding an extra font dir in
ln -svn $XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/fonts/OTF /usr/share/fonts/X11-OTF
ln -svn $XORG_PREFIX/lib/X11/fonts/TTF /usr/share/fonts/X11/TTF
where XORG_PREFIX obviously is /usr in your case. Now, get that dir
out of /etc/fonts/fonts.conf! There's a lot of crappy fonts that you
don't want fontconfig to
On 4/6/06, Johannes Lächele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry my fault, I didn't mention that before building GNOME I tested X
using twm
and everything worked fine
so I'm sure its something wrong with my installation of GNOME.
Is there any info in /var/log/Xorg.0.log about the crash? Which
Is there any info in /var/log/Xorg.0.log about the crash? Which
program is it bombing on in the splash screen (nautilus, gnome-panel,
etc.)?
I looked through the whole log and cant find any errors
(here is the log: http://laechele.ath.cx/siddian/blfs/Xorg.0.log)
Its loading panels,
Johannes Lächele wrote:
After running 'startx x-output'
(get it here: http://laechele.ath.cx/siddian/blfs/x-output) and looking
at the warnings/errors I tried, just as a guess, rebuilding
gnome-applets, but no luck, no luck at all ^^.
Gnome can be hard to debug because there are so many
15 matches
Mail list logo
