Ken Moffat([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 11:35:30PM +0100:
Where did you see indications of 1.0.6 appearing soon ?
http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6950
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Ilja Honkonen([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:29:35AM +0300:
I was trying to use ogg123 from vorbis tools to test my sound
configuration and it didn't have permission to use the sound device. I
fixed this by adding MODE=0666 to all lines about alsa devices in
25-lfs.rules. Is
Matthew Burgess([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:23:53PM +0100:
This is on a gcc-4.0.1 based LFS. Has anyone encountered this problem?
You are not alone in this.
I just tried in my own build and i receive the same.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
Dennis J Perkins([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:19:57PM -0600:
I can compile cairo-0.9.2 and libpixmap0.1.3, but I still can't compile
cairo-1.0. When I was searching for libpixmap, I saw some messages
saying that cairo-1.0 doesn't depend on libpixmap because libpixmap is
now
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:48:55PM -0800:
Jeez. Figured it out, Ag. Apply
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/bc/bc-1.06-fixes-1.patch
That was it Dan,many thanks.
Funny,i search all the web for the fix,and i had it (the patch) in my disk. :)
Dan Nicholson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:41:05AM -0700:
On 4/7/06, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 08:08 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
The problem is this: this newly released tarballs are slated for Xorg
7.1. Read this post by the developer of
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:09:14AM -0500:
So, that said, how many modules are you speaking of Ag?
Lets see,and if we go with the right order and without to count the
Mesa/libdrm must be 10,the following.
proto
util
lib
xbitmaps
app
data
font
luit
xorg-server
Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:40:46AM -0500:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote:
Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release
here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many
reports) that the 7.0 build
