Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:29 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: >> > *WebKit*: No signal >> >> Can we request a signal? >> > > It strikes me as odd to request a

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate the includeShadowRoots argument on DOMParser

Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10139 Summary The includeShadowRoots argument was a never-standardized argument to the DOMParser.parseFromString() function, which was there to allow imperative parsing of HTML content that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

LGTM3 On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thank you! LGTM2 > On 3/15/24 1:13 PM, Tommy Steimel wrote: > > Got it, thanks! Adding one in crrev.com/c/5375045 > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:51 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> If a human can observe the expected behavior by clicking on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

Thank you! LGTM2 On 3/15/24 1:13 PM, Tommy Steimel wrote: Got it, thanks! Adding one in crrev.com/c/5375045 On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:51 AM Mike Taylor wrote: If a human can observe the expected behavior by clicking on a button and noticing the lack of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Call stacks in crash reports from unresponsive web pages

Hi all, This sort of reporting would be incredibly useful for third-party Javascript given how widely it is deployed and potentially dangerous an infinite loop in that context could be. I'm an engineer who writes third-party JavaScript for Google's Display Ads products and having

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:42 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa < raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > Philip Jägenstedt writes: > > > Taking a closer look, I think it's really because the tests depend on > > MojoJS, and if we exclude tentative tests > > < >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

Philip Jägenstedt writes: > Taking a closer look, I think it's really because the tests depend on > MojoJS, and if we exclude tentative tests > > only > surface level tests remain. > > Compute Pressure tests

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

Got it, thanks! Adding one in crrev.com/c/5375045 On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 7:51 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > If a human can observe the expected behavior by clicking on a button and > noticing the lack of the return to tab button, then effectively yes. > On 3/15/24 10:40 AM, Tommy Steimel wrote: > >

Re: [blink-dev] How to config ".gn" and "buildconfig.gn"?

Seems like using CEF is probably your best bet. Christian On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:53 PM Hirokazu Kosako <16.kos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for distubing you. > I want to use blink as a part of SVG renderer. > In such case, should I use chromium or CEF? > > Kosako > 2024年3月15日金曜日 0:06:15

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 4:11 PM Raphael Kubo da Costa < raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > Philip Jägenstedt writes: > > > Taking a look at https://wpt.fyi/results/compute-pressure I see that > most > > of the tests are tentative. Should they still be, or why doesn't the spec > > cover so

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

Philip Jägenstedt writes: > Taking a look at https://wpt.fyi/results/compute-pressure I see that most > of the tests are tentative. Should they still be, or why doesn't the spec > cover so much of the behavior? As someone who reviewed most of the test: I think "tentative" should be removed from

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

If a human can observe the expected behavior by clicking on a button and noticing the lack of the return to tab button, then effectively yes. On 3/15/24 10:40 AM, Tommy Steimel wrote: I didn't realize you could do that. So if I make a manual WPT test, I can make it depend on code in //chrome?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

I didn't realize you could do that. So if I make a manual WPT test, I can make it depend on code in //chrome? On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 6:15 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Is there any reason to not convert > https://steimelchrome.github.io/document-pip/hide-back-to-tab-button.html > into a manual WPT >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

Thanks Kenneth! Given the feedback from Whereby (thanks Andreas!) and the aggregated origin trial feedback that Ajay shared I think we should ship this, just a few more notes/questions. Please do what you think makes sense with the naming. I think there's a case for renaming, but it's up to you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG context-fill and context-stroke

On 3/14/24 6:29 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 3:13 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/14/24 1:17 PM, Stefan Zager wrote: Contact emails sza...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: add option to hide back-to-tab button

Is there any reason to not convert https://steimelchrome.github.io/document-pip/hide-back-to-tab-button.html into a manual WPT ? Manual tests aren't ideal, but something seems better than nothing. On 3/14/24 9:42 PM, Domenic Denicola

Re: [blink-dev] How to config ".gn" and "buildconfig.gn"?

Thank you so much! I successed to build chromium. Kosako 2024年3月15日金曜日 0:06:15 UTC+9 Christian Biesinger: > You can't really build blink on its own, it's only meant to be built > as part of Chromium. > > Also that repository is 8 years old, current work is happening in the > Chromium repository

Re: [blink-dev] How to config ".gn" and "buildconfig.gn"?

Sorry for distubing you. I want to use blink as a part of SVG renderer. In such case, should I use chromium or CEF? Kosako 2024年3月15日金曜日 0:06:15 UTC+9 Christian Biesinger: > You can't really build blink on its own, it's only meant to be built > as part of Chromium. > > Also that repository is 8

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

Thanks Philip! I commented on the issue you created, but I don't feel strongly about any of the options as it is easy to convert from one to the other. We looked at it before and decided to not change it then, but we are open to good arguments so please chime in. On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:51 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

*Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames* Contact emails zheda.c...@intel.com, fdo...@chromium.org Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/timers-and-user-prompts.html Summary Align wake ups of JavaScript timers for unimportant