Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-21 Thread Zheda Chen
uot; are. What exactly is the definition? You > mention that Safari has a similar intervention - how similar is it? Do we > know? I wonder if there is alignment for this "unimportant cross-origin > frame" concept, if we shouldn't specify that somehow. > On 3/15/24 2:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-15 Thread Zheda Chen
y and security teams review all intents, so requesting reviews and answering the relevant questionnaires is the best path forward. Looking forward to the new I2S - thanks! On 3/14/24 11:22 AM, Zheda Chen wrote: More details are updated in ChromeStatus, including interoperability and compatibility ri

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-14 Thread Zheda Chen
Yes the intent started as an origin trial, now more details and bullets are added in ChromeStatus and I'm about to send "intent to ship". As for your question about "alignment interval", the alignment interval for Chromium would be 32ms. The specification mentions "the SetTimeout/SetInterval

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-14 Thread Zheda Chen
vior compares to WebKit and Gecko, would be helpful. Also, can you request the privacy/security/enterprise/debuggability/testing gates on Chrome Status? On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:12 PM Zheda Chen wrote: Okay I update the process stage in Chrome Platform Status, and paste the newly-generated

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-12 Thread Zheda Chen
Okay I update the process stage in Chrome Platform Status, and paste the newly-generated Intent above. Please take a look. https://chromestatus.com/feature/5106220399853568 On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 at 8:57:59 PM UTC+8 Zheda Chen wrote: > *Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-12 Thread Zheda Chen
gt;> >>> 2024年3月5日(火) 5:19 Mike Taylor : >>> >>>> My concern is going from 1% to 50% on stable - if something does go >>>> wrong, that's a _lot_ of folks who will experience it. Are you open to >>>> something smaller like 5%? If not, why not

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-02-28 Thread Zheda Chen
y you would like to experiment on 50% of stable, vs > requesting permission to ship? That's quite a leap from 1% - and it seems > you already have results demonstrating performance improvements. > > Also, mind answering the question of specifying "unimportant frames"? > On 2/27

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-02-27 Thread Zheda Chen
the experiment timelines and what stable > percentages you are requesting permission to experiment on? > > On 2/22/24 2:30 AM, Zheda Chen wrote: > > Contact emails > zheda...@intel.com, fdo...@chromium.org > > Specification > https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/timers-an

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-02-22 Thread Zheda Chen
Contact emails zheda.c...@intel.com, fdo...@chromium.org Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/timers-and-user-prompts.html Summary Align wake ups of JavaScript timers for unimportant cross-origin frames. Currently, DOM timers <32ms are all opt-out from AlignWakeUps [1] due to