LGTM3
I think there's some interop risk here if Apple and Mozilla won't add
support for explicit "auto" values and developers would start using them,
but I agree that there's no real incentive for developers to do so.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:47 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2
>
> On 10/19/22
Hi all,
i've been working to fix an application that will be affected by PNA
preflights (we have an application that talks to a private server and a
local -127.0.0.1- server).
As I understood from this blog post
This week, no sooner than October 26, we will begin increasing the Privacy
Sandbox Relevance and Measurement origin trial population towards 5% of
Chrome Stable users for Attribution Reporting and Topics APIs. You can
expect to see traffic levels increase over a period of a few days.
Pre-stable
Thanks Etienne.
LGTM1 to ship - good luck with the rollout.
On 10/20/22 12:18 PM, Etienne Pierre-doray wrote:
Have we asked Mozilla for a signal?
I haven't asked for a signal. I can ask but this feels N/A; this
change is Web facing but remains spec-compliant, and I don't think we
want
On 10/20/22 11:39 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 10/20/22 18:23, Mike Taylor wrote:
On 10/19/22 8:05 PM, Etienne Pierre-doray wrote:
/Gecko/: No signal
Have we asked Mozilla for a signal?
I don't think so. I could say we're interested in trying to reduce
wake-ups, but it is unclear how this
LGTM2
On 10/19/22 8:38 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Thanks Munira for the detailed explanation, and thanks for filing the
Gecko and WebKit bugs!
I think that from a web developer's point of view, this won't be a
feature that you actively use, but sensible defaults and the lack of a
Cool - thanks for the info and for updating the explainer.
On 10/24/22 2:09 AM, Yuzu Saijo wrote:
Thanks Mike!
I update the description in the explainer. We talked to the privacy
team and decided to say "Extensions" for all the extension related
reasons (we decided that it's okay to expose
>
> 2.1 is the new version. We can ignore 2.0.
>
I suppose this doesn't need to be released on M108 then. I'll keep
experimenting.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 4:36 PM Hannes Payer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:31 PM Etienne Pierre-doray <
> etien...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Is that a
I think it makes sense to flip it on now, and turn it off if printing NG
gets reverted.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 9:14 AM Frédéric Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Reading [1], I don't think any distinction between pure blink features or
> UI/browser features for "feature freeze". I understand the only
Hello,
Reading [1], I don't think any distinction between pure blink features
or UI/browser features for "feature freeze". I understand the only
requirement is to have code complete, but probably turning on the flag
after the branch point is fine.
However [2] also mentions "Two weeks prior
Thanks Mike!
I update the description in the explainer. We talked to the privacy team
and decided to say "Extensions" for all the extension related reasons (we
decided that it's okay to expose the presence of extensions, but will avoid
giving any further information).
Yuzu
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022
11 matches
Mail list logo
