Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PermissionStatus.prototype.name

Hey Marcos, On 8/19/21 2:09 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: *Tracking bug* https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=897309 I think that's maybe a mistake, https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1236856 seems to be the right bug. later, Mike -- You received this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Standardize existing client hint naming

, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:10 AM Mike Taylor <mailto:miketa...@chromium.org>> wrote: This I2P seems to have fallen through the cracks (understandably lots of vacation happening this month). Any thoughts from API owners? On 8/9/21 2:20 PM, Ari Chivuk

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Standardize existing client hint naming

This I2P seems to have fallen through the cracks (understandably lots of vacation happening this month). Any thoughts from API owners? On 8/9/21 2:20 PM, Ari Chivukula wrote: * Contact emails aric...@chromium.org ,

[blink-dev] Re: Update on User-Agent Reduction plans

Hi Jérémie, Yes, this will be true (assuming `HTTP_USER_AGENT` is derived from the `User-Agent` request header field in whatever backend system you're working with). thanks, Mike On 9/2/21 1:49 PM, Jérémie Le Pévédic wrote: While reducing, can you confirm if the HTTP_USER_AGENT variable

[blink-dev] Re: Update on User-Agent Reduction plans

Hi Vladimir, Can you help me understand why the JS API (e.g., `navigator.userAgentData.getHighEntropyValues(["uaFullVersion"])`) won't work in a web extension? thanks, Mike On 9/9/21 4:48 PM, Vladimir Pastukhov wrote: *Hi, what about web extensions?* * * *How the extension developers are

[blink-dev] Re: Update on User-Agent Reduction plans

I suppose there's always a possibility, but I'm not aware of anything that would cause it to reject today. As a fallback, you could parse the major version from `navigator.userAgentData.brands`, or just grab that info from `navigator.userAgent` (the major version will always be there, even

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Disable propagation of body style to viewport when contained

Hey Rune, Is there any way for developers to know behavior has changed on their sites when this ships? (Or alternatively, any clues for folks triaging bugs, besides bisecting?). I'm wondering about sites where breakage is pretty bad. Would it be useful to ship a devtools issue (probably

[blink-dev] Re: Update on User-Agent Reduction plans

:48 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Hi there blink-dev and Chromium community, I’d like to give an update on > our current thinking and plans around User-Agent Reduction (née “User Agent > Freezi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Disable propagation of body style to viewport when contained

On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 4:23:13 PM UTC-4 Rune Lillesveen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 2:55 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Hey Rune, >> >> Is there any way for developers to know behavior has changed on their >> sites when this ships? (Or a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

Hi Xiaocheng, On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > Summary > > A custom counter style can be constructed with a meaning that is obvious > visually, but impossible to meaningfully represent via a speech synthesizer > or other non-visual means, or possible but

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

On 9/23/21 8:19 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:25 AM Thomas Steiner > wrote: Not sure this was discussed before, but could a new boolean attribute that opts the element in to the new behavior be the answer? At the risk of jinxing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove clamping of setTimeout(..., 0)

ext step. On Friday, January 29, 2021 at 6:14:07 AM UTC+8 Mike Taylor wrote: Howdy, In general, I think if Firefox has been able to ship this behavior it's likely web-compatible (modulo different code paths being served behind UA sniffing). There have been subtle race-y JS timing bug diffe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove clamping of setTimeout(..., 0)

;>>>>> However, even if the beta baking does not reveal any issues, breakage due to this can be hard to understand, and could be in code (libraries) that aren't easy to update. It would be prudent to make this a finch-controlled experiment, to avoid a potential urgent revert in a point release. >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Add support for Promise to Blobs in clipboard item

On 9/29/21 7:53 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:02 AM 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev mailto:blink-dev@chromium.org>> wrote: Interoperability and Compatibility /Gecko/: In Development(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1619947

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

On 10/5/21 6:50 AM, Rayan Kanso wrote: Contact emails rayank...@chromium.org, jakearchib...@chromium.org Specification https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ Diff: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1312 Summary Allows

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks - I also don't think there's a lot of value in this particular header being the odd-one-out, just wanted to confirm we're not going to ship

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

collect values reported by major platforms/devices and devise a reasonable "bucket system" for them. On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 8:14 AM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

poralLayerId` in the httparchive.latest.requests_desktop dataset and got zero results - that makes me feel better about hitting send). Best, Chris On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:30 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Chris, On 12/17/21 3:24 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: Cont

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Freeze: The User-Agent string

lished today? On Wednesday, 19 May 2021 at 21:49:10 UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Par (and others), Today we published an update on our UA Reduction plans, in a new thread: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/e3pZJu96g6c Happy to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Hi Chris, On 12/17/21 3:24 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: Contact emails * chcunning...@chromium.org * Explainer * https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/blob/main/explainer.md * Specification *

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

On 12/16/21 5:52 PM, Charlie Reis wrote: On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 7:28 AM 'Daniel Vogelheim' via blink-dev wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:51 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 12/14/21 11:35 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: It seems more or less everyone agrees on this being

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

) This feature  does not expose more than what you can query/infer from the UA string. Would that exposure map cleanly to UA-Platform <https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/#sec-ch-ua-platform>, which is considered low-entropy and exposed by default? Or would it add more than that? /cc +Mike

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

On 11/15/21 10:56 AM, Hongchan Choi wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:49 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/15/21 1:47 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:33 PM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev wrote: TAG review status Completed: Web Audio API

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

On 11/17/21 6:02 AM, Frédéric Wang wrote: I started to poke through https://github.com/search?p=5=%22-webkit-standard%22=Code out of curiosity and a few things stand out: 1) Some tools used for archiving / exports appear: Evernote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

On 11/16/21 9:46 AM, Frédéric Wang wrote: Contact emails fw...@igalia.com, ssin...@igalia.com Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-family-prop Summary Remove support for the font-family value "-webkit-standard". This

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

e data about the distribution. On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 8:05 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/15/21 10:56 AM, Hongchan Choi wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 6:49 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/15/21 1:47 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:33 PM 'Ajay Rahateka

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Supports keyword format in @font-face src descriptor

Hi Eric, On 11/11/21 8:18 PM, Eric Huang wrote: Contact emails ele...@gmail.com Explainer https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/#src-desc Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/#src-desc Summary Adds support

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: New Canvas 2D API

On 10/29/21 1:23 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Hey Domenic! :) On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:00 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: FWIW the two HTML editors on the thread (myself and Anne, with our HTML editor hats on), as well as Mozilla (via Anne with his Mozilla hat on), prefer the throwing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: HTMLInputElement showPicker()

On 11/9/21 10:49 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: These seem like good discussions to have on the spec thread, instead of a Blink-specific mailing list :). Sure, I guess I don't feel strongly about the venue - but re-posted at https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6909#issuecomment-964292294. --

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: HTMLInputElement showPicker()

Hi François, On 11/3/21 3:16 PM, 'François Beaufort ' via blink-dev wrote: Summary The HTMLInputElement showPicker() method allows web developers to programmatically show a browser picker for temporal, color, and file inputs. Blink component Blink>Forms

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

f the "true" token for the new Access-Control-Allow-Private-Network header, and specify that, but I'm not sure it would be terribly useful. Do you think otherwise? Cheers, Titouan On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 4:45 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Titouan, I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

Hi Titouan, I'm curious what the plan is for structured headers. https://github.com/WICG/private-network-access/issues/45 is marked as blocked - has there been other progress or thinking behind the scenes? thanks, Mike On 11/29/21 10:36 AM, 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Calling PaymentRequest.show without user activation

LGTM3 On 12/1/21 12:34 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:33 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to deprecate in M98 and remove in M99, assuming no surprises come up on the usage front. On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 6:31 PM Stephen Mcgruer wrote: To be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl Enumeration API (for m99)

LGTM1 On 12/8/21 1:46 PM, Frank Tang wrote: [for m99 AFTER m98 branching off Dec 9, 2021] Contact emails ft...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-enumeration Specification https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-enumeration/ Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

LGTM3 - I'm excited for this addition to CSS. On 12/13/21 12:45 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:47 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: *LGTM1* Thanks for fixing the related CSSPreloadScanner issues! :) On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:58 AM Xiaocheng Hu wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Convert adoptedStyleSheets to use ObservableArray

LGTM2 On 12/14/21 10:05 AM, Camille Lamy wrote: Thanks Mason! I wasn't sure if it was possible to share it cross-origin, hence my question. If you can only get a non-shared copied version, then this is fine from a security POV. On Tuesday, December 14, 2021 at 4:53:52 AM UTC+1 Mason Freed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Hi Sonia, Could you please make this spreadsheet public? thanks, Mike On 12/15/21 7:38 AM, Sonia Singla wrote: Link to spreadsheet[0] [0] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lChXA87u2r7yuBdfJu283UDsGhRGqT9ol2rVwVOQw0o/edit?resourcekey=0-yCKFjRfFk0RYeNm-d6DvFw#gid=1758573992 On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

LGTM2 w/ same condition. On 12/15/21 11:47 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 conditional on those metrics landing (but no need to wait for data from the metrics to come in). On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 3:22:26 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: To circle back - last week we (myself + some other

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

/spreadsheets/d/1WZTRBujaaFrtUaRnBOoVYzJkZuColXFN-GgToF6nR5Q/edit#gid=73457229 On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Sonia, Could you please make this spreadsheet public? thanks, Mike On 12/15/21 7:38 AM, Sonia Singla wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

On 12/14/21 11:35 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: It seems more or less everyone agrees on this being a good thing, so it mainly comes down to web compatibility. How much of the web will break, and how badly. The numbers mentioned, 0.5% of sites set document.domain, 0.05% seem to depend on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

Hi Seokho, Thanks for working on this! On 12/9/21 6:56 PM, Seokho Song wrote: Contact emails 0xdev...@gmail.com Explainer https://github.com/DevSDK/calc-infinity-and-NaN/blob/master/explainer.md Specification

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Mike Taylor

Thanks! I'm also obligated to say "Opera did it first" (where the "it" is hire me). On 11/29/21 1:10 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Welcome Mike!! :D On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:24 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Hi blink-dev, I'm pleased to announce that +Mike Taylo

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intl Locale Info in ECMA402 (for m99)

LGTM2 On 12/13/21 6:27 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:20 PM Frank Tang wrote: Dear API owners: [Five days after my I2S email] Any questions or feedback I should/need to take action before you grant me a lgtm? Thanks Regards, Frank

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AbortSignal.prototype.throwIfAborted

LGTM1 - seems like a useful feature and good to see that Gecko and WebKit have already shipped. On 2/10/22 5:54 PM, Scott Haseley wrote: Contact emails shase...@chromium.org Explainer Discussion: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/927 Examples:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Make 'true' a truthy value for window.open boolean features

LGTM3 - if anything I would expect things to unbreak (might be interesting to look at histograms for the number of popups opened before and after). On 3/4/22 10:27 AM, Rick Byers wrote: Make true truthy, who could object to that? :-) LGTM2 Seriously though, I agree on the sentiment of the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Block external protocol in sandboxed iframe.

On 3/7/22 8:45 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:35 PM Arthur Sonzogni wrote: We contacted several websites. Some confirmed they will be positively impacted. Microsoft Teams, the #1 requested adding

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Block external protocol in sandboxed iframe.

On 3/7/22 10:37 AM, Arthur Sonzogni wrote: On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 3:47:11 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/7/22 8:45 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:35 PM Arthur Sonzogni wrote: We contacted several websites. Some confirmed

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Priority Hints

This seems genuinely useful, thanks for working on it. What's the current thinking on exposing `priority` on Request, i.e. https://github.com/WICG/priority-hints/issues/11#issuecomment-396610469? On 3/3/22 4:54 PM, Addy Osmani wrote: > Priority Hints introduces a developer-set "fetchpriority"

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Priority Hints

progress. I don't think we want to hold shipping on that though. It's a nice-to-have addition but isn't needed for the vast majority of use cases. On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 5:25 PM Mike Taylor wrote: This seems genuinely useful, thanks for working on it. What's

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Declarative Link Capturing for PWAs

Yoav's reasoning sounds good to me. LGTM2. On 3/14/22 3:50 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Hey Alan, As this is an exceptional request, I believe this requires 3 LGTMs. The risk present here is that we'd be creating some breakage risk from terminating the OT ~3 months down the line. Weighing this risk

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: MediaCapabilities API for WebRTC

LGTM3 On 3/16/22 9:30 AM, mkwst via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM2, but I'd second Yoav's request to pay attention to the discussion around fingerprinting. My understanding is that we're going to be bucketing things in our implementation so as to reduce the total surface exposed via different

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaCapabilities API for WebRTC

On 3/14/22 1:30 PM, 'Johannes Kron' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails k...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/drkron/media-capabilities/blob/webrtc_examples/explainer.md#webrtc https://github.com/w3c/media-capabilities/pull/191 Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: font-palette and custom @font-palette-values palettes

LGTM2 On 3/15/22 11:20 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 - given the early positive signal and the fact it's already shipping in Safari. Please follow up on any feedback from others if it comes up on that thread. On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:27 PM Dominik Röttsches wrote: Hi again Yoav and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation API V3

On 3/9/22 10:27 AM, Nick Burris wrote: Contact emails nbur...@chromium.org, rous...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org, ma...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/blob/main/explainer.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype + Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation API V3

On 3/15/22 4:42 PM, Nick Burris wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 4:52 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 3/9/22 10:27 AM, Nick Burris wrote: Contact emails nbur...@chromium.org, rous...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org, ma...@chromium.org Explainer https

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1253162 Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status https://chromestatus.com/feature/5730414630010880 This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status <https://chromestatus.com/>.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: CSS Values Level 4 Calc Simplification and Serialization

On 3/9/22 11:00 AM, 박중헌 wrote: Contact emails pjh0...@gmail.com, jh718.p...@samsung.com Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-simplification,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

share as appropriate here. Cheers, Titouan On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:26 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM3 for step 1. On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 6:11 AM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 for step 1. On 12/6/21 5:31 AM, Titouan Rigoudy wrote: *assuming I get 2 more

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: WebUSB SameObject

This seems like a useful ergonomics addition. LGTM1. On 2/25/22 8:09 PM, 'Jack Hsieh' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails chengw...@chromium.com Explainer None Specification https://wicg.github.io/webusb/#device-usage

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: SerialPort integration with WritableStream controller AbortSignal

LGTM1 On 2/10/22 3:25 PM, Reilly Grant wrote: Contact emails reil...@chromium.org Specification https://wicg.github.io/serial/#writable-attribute https://github.com/WICG/serial/pull/160 Summary This

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Calling PaymentRequest.show without user activation

and so are planning to push this deprecation out to M100 as well to align with that. Thanks, Stephen On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 3:25:01 PM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM3 On 12/1/21 12:34 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Dec 1, 202

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Calling PaymentRequest.show without user activation

n intermediary iframe that was created and destroyed again before this line of code executed", it can be tricky. On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 09:27, Mike Taylor wrote: Hi Stephen, Is there anything we can learn about their challenges that might apply to the broader ecosystem?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Multi-Screen Window Placement

Hi Michael, I think you and team have done a great job incorporating TAG and API ergonomics feedback (hi Jake!) as well as privacy concerns. Nice work. LGTM1. On 2/14/22 8:28 PM, Michael Wasserman wrote: Contact emails m...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Omnibox Prerendering

LGTM2 On 3/21/22 8:12 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM1. The two issues I considered blocking were Alex's concerns around opt-out, and the BroadcastChannel integration. It seems to me like there's still discussion to be had on even better solutions than y'all have landed on for both (headers in

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Freeze: The User-Agent string

Hi James, We are committed to achieving the purpose of the Privacy Sandbox commitments accepted by the CMA in February 2022. We encourage feedback on how to better achieve that purpose through our technical

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebHID exclusionFilters option in requestDevice()

LGTM1 On 3/24/22 11:51 PM, 'François Beaufort ' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com mattreyno...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/WICG/webhid/blob/main/EXPLAINER.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Attribution Reporting API

ter, if issues arise, and to continue the origin trial through M104, inclusive. On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 5:49 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for working on this! On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 8:36:50 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: Hi John, On 3/25/22 5:49 PM, John Delaney wrote:

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Network State Partitioning (again)

* Contact emails brgoldst...@chromium.org , miketa...@chromium.org , mme...@chromium.org Summary We would like to run another experiment for the Network State Partitioning effort

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Convert adoptedStyleSheets to use ObservableArray

2021 at 4:12 PM Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 12/14/21 10:05 AM, Camille Lamy wrote: Thanks Mason! I wasn't sure if it was possible to share it cross-origin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Attribution Reporting API

Hi John, On 3/25/22 5:49 PM, John Delaney wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org , apaselti...@chromium.org , lin...@chromium.org Developers interested in the Attribution Reporting

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: hidden=until-found HTML attribute and beforematch event

LGTM1 On 3/17/22 3:10 PM, Joey Arhar wrote: Contact emails jar...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/master/explainers/hidden-content-explainer.md Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7475 Design docs

Re: [blink-dev] testing CH-UA

Привет Ян! If using the devtools mobile emulation, you can add a custom device and there is a toggle to open the "User agent client hints" section where you can add header values: https://i.imgur.com/9vazymM.png. We should probably add sensible defaults to the mobile emulation options, I

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 4 (minor version reduction)

** *Contact emails* * miketa...@chromium.org, abe...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#explainer-reducing-user-agent-granularity

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Support for filesystem URLs on Android media

On 2/3/22 8:37 PM, Nigel Tao wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 3:23 AM Brianna Goldstein wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:49 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: At the risk of piling on with another question: are these URLs different from `file://` scheme URLs? @Yoav Weiss yes these are from the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capability Delegation with Payment Request

Appreciate the replies, Mustaq. This seems like a useful addition to the platform, thanks for working on it. LGTM1. On 1/27/22 12:35 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote: Hi Mike: Appreciate your feedback.  My answers are inline. Mustaq On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 6:03 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Hi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement: Fluent Scrollbars.

Hi Rahul, Would you mind creating a chromestatus entry for this intent? (See "Step 0" at http://dev.chromium.org/blink/launching-features for a link). Also, out of curiosity (because I don't know much about scrollbars) - will this proposed change have an impact on a page's layout? thanks,

[blink-dev] Re: Intent To Experiment: User-Agent Client Hints GREASE Update

And in case anyone wonders: why those ones in particular? It's everything that's allowed inside an sf-string , except escaped "\" and escaped DQUOTE (because we know those make WAFs very, very sad). On 2/1/22 10:00 AM, Matt

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Network State Partitioning

FYI, we're going to run some other experiments to see how to improve performance here. (And we'll send a new I2S after that, rather than revive this thread.) Thanks everyone. On 2/2/22 1:05 PM, 'Matt Menke' via blink-dev wrote: Thanks for the feedback!  Responses inline. On Wed, Feb 2, 2022

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

Hey Xiaocheng, Thanks for working on improving interop! A few thoughts and questions below. On 2/8/22 7:25 PM, Xiaocheng Hu wrote: Contact emails xiaoche...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification None. Not a standard feature. Summary Event.path is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: hwb() color notation

LGTM1 (Super cool first contribution, Jan) On 2/8/22 5:40 AM, Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: Contact emails andr...@chromium.org, on behalf of: jan.kei...@gmail.com Explainer None Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

5:37 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 2:49:55 AM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Xiaocheng, Thanks for working on improving interop! A few thoughts and que

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Storage Foundation API

LGTM3 - agree with Mike On 2/11/22 5:17 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 under the same conditions, for one last extension here. On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:14 AM Mike West wrote: Hey Emanuel, API owners discussed this intent this week and the week before, with a fair amount of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Battery Status API in Insecure Origins

LGTM2 - can you please file a bug to explicitly remove usage by YouTube? On 1/14/22 8:00 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM1 to restrict this API to secure contexts with a 3 milestone deprecation window. If blockers come up in the meantime, we can reevaluate, but I'm satisfied with the spot checks

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS Subgrid

(I'm not Mathias, but...) You can just respond to this thread with the debug info, and update the Chromestatus entry as well - thanks! On 1/20/22 3:57 PM, 'Ethan Jimenez' via blink-dev wrote: Hi everyone! Philip, thanks for the encouragement, I’m super excited to deliver subgrid knowing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS ALPN extension in wss-schemed WebSockets connections

LGTM1, thanks for improving interop here. On 1/19/22 3:22 PM, David Benjamin wrote: Contact emails david...@chromium.org Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7301 Summary This is a PSA about a small tweak to an existing feature. The change is

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Battery Status API on Insecure Origins

I think it's fine to keep the warning CL in M99 as long as we stick to the original timeline of removal. On 1/25/22 7:39 AM, Raphael Kubo Da Costa wrote: Thanks everyone for the LGTMs. Due to an oversight I ended up landing the CL that adds a deprecation warning

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Sec-CH-UA-WoW64 Client Hint

Contact emails miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#explainer-reducing-user-agent-granularity Specification https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/#sec-ch-ua-wow64 Summary The Sec-CH-UA-WoW64 Client Hint is a backwards compatible

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capability Delegation with Payment Request

Hi Mustaq, On 1/25/22 4:45 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote: Contact emails mus...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/capability-delegation Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: NDEFReader makeReadOnly()

LGTM2 On 1/26/22 11:43 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, January 24, 2022 at 9:52:26 AM UTC+1 François Beaufort wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com Explainer

[blink-dev] Re: Request for deprecation trial (I2E): Sending the full User-Agent string after User-Agent reduction

Admittedly it's a very long timeline, but we're trying provide plenty of time for sites to migrate to reduce the burden on the ecosystem. On 1/26/22 10:37 AM, Ali Beyad wrote: The timelines post contains more

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: mix-blend-mode: plus-lighter

LGTM2, thanks for the very well written explainer-slash-blog-post. On 1/26/22 9:42 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 This seems like a useful small addition! Following WebKit here makes sense. On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 5:40:45 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails

[blink-dev] Re: Request for deprecation trial (I2E): Sending the full User-Agent string after User-Agent reduction

Thanks Ali. It's also useful to have a look at https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/e3pZJu96g6c/m/X9HcrSkVAgAJ for the high-level plan, in addition to the timelines post which has timelines

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Origin Private File System extension: AccessHandle

LGTM3 On 4/12/22 2:04 AM, Mike West wrote: LGTM2. -mike On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 6:08 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for pushing this through. Please make sure to follow-up on any feedback we'd get on the PR itself. On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 7:44 PM Emanuel Krivoy

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SerialPort forget()

LGTM1 % https://github.com/WICG/serial/pull/161 landing. On 4/11/22 4:58 AM, 'François Beaufort ' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com reil...@google.com Explainer N/A Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Digital Goods API 2.1

On 4/15/22 12:31 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 4:45 PM Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: Contact emails glen...@chromium.org, rous...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/main/explainer.md#api-v21

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate element's functionality

On 4/13/22 12:48 PM, Mason Freed wrote: Contact emails mas...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7816 https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6003 Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7816 Summary The element can be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate element's functionality

ples if you like, but I think these two examples should be "ok". Again, thanks for taking a look! Thanks, Mason On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:06 AM Mike Taylor wrote: On 4/13/22 12:48 PM, Mason Freed wrote: Contact emails mas...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate element's functionality

upports anyway, so that should be all we're capable of breaking. LMK if the above satisfies your desire to do more spot checking, or if you'd prefer I look deeper. Thanks, Mason On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 1:52 PM Mike Taylor wrote: Oh cool, I didn't notice the fallback iframe or embed, thank

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries Level 4 Syntax & Evaluation

Bonus LGTM4 (Mike just beat me before I hit send). On 4/13/22 8:23 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 Since the Yandex scripts are metrics scripts, there's little chance that their use would result in breakage, and the script is most likely doing some sort of "browser fingerprinting" and trying to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookie Expires/Max-Age attribute upper limit

The good news is sites can continue to use max-age to reset the expiration 400 days in the future, every time the user visits (assuming that's desired behavior), for example in JS: document.cookie = `lol=ok; max-age=${60 * 60 * 24 * 400}`; We'll work with DevRel to make sure this is properly

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >