Hi all,
just in case you missed it the proposal to put LOOL in a kind of "attic"
as it seems very few people are interested in it since it has been
forked, has sparked a wider debate.
Please do take a bit of time to read the threads below so that you can
make you minds up in what went wrong
Hi Thorsten,
On 10/01/2022 16:48, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Again, for this to be constructive, could you please suggest concrete
changes to the proposed policy?
I did propose a concrete change which sparked this conversation. Here it
is in case you missed it:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> > Can I see the adjustments/changes to the proposal then please?
>
> The proposal, as stated in my previous emails, is related to the eventual
> "de-atticisation" of the project.
>
Again, for this to be constructive, could you please suggest concrete
changes to
On 09/01/2022 17:27, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Both sentences imply that the ESC have in praxis a blocking veto,
independent of the decision by a board, for both procedures.
In general, I think it is wise when (re-)starting an engineering
project to get input from the engineering community
Hi Thorsten,
see below.
On 10/01/2022 12:46, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo,
let's stay focused -
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Do you have concrete suggestions on changing the actual
proposal?
Well, yes. That's what the rest of the email you replied to was about.
Can I see the
Hi Paolo,
let's stay focused -
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> > Do you have concrete suggestions on changing the actual
> > proposal?
>
> Well, yes. That's what the rest of the email you replied to was about.
>
Can I see the adjustments/changes to the proposal then please?
> I'm not even suggesting
+1 on Lothar's proposal.
Paolo
On 09/01/2022 18:27, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Hi Thorsten, Emiliano, all,
thanks for the reminder Thorsten, as the discussion goes on in
different areas of using this status of attic, my feedback is more on
the procedural aspect of it.
It says, Quote:
" ...
Dear Marina Latini,
Marina Latini ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan.
7., P, 0:10):
> Dear László Németh,
>
> let me first take this opportunity to personally congratulate you for
> having been elected as member of the board. Then I kindly invite you to
> officially accept your position in the board
Hi Thorsten,
On 09/01/2022 17:45, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
I would wait for an eventual vote until a few weeks after FOSDEM just in
case more questions and/or interest about the future of LOOL come up.
The attic proposal is only incidentally related to
