Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> > The evolving consensus in the board it
> > seems (though of course I cannot speak for them), is that TDF should
> > for the moment close the chapter of LibreOffice Online.
>
> More than a consensus I believe that we may have to resign to the fact that
> we may have been
Hi all,
I believe a few comments require notes and corrections as they may
mislead the community:
On 26/01/2022 17:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Not directly answering on a controversial proposal,
Members of the community are actually asking for answers and members of
the board should help in
Hi Marco,
it's unclear if we're talking past each other -
Marco Marinello wrote:
> it's of course legit to ask people contributing here to comply with the
> ML netiquette but I don't think closing the thread here is the solution.
>
This part of the thread is a conversation about the past, and
Hello,
the following decision, which was taken in private on 2022-01-20, is now
made public in accordance with our statutes.
The Board of Directors at the time of voting consists of 7 seat holders
(not including deputies). In order to be quorate, the vote needs to have
1/2 or more of the
1. Call to order & Roll Call
The meeting took place on 2021-12-30.
Present: Gustavo Pacheco, Gabriele Ponzo, Muhammet Kara, Uwe Altmann,
Marina Latini, Shinji Enoki, Ahmad Haris, Dennis Roczek
2. New Members
The Membership Committee has received Membership Applications since the
last review
Hi Marco,
I have to agree with you here that maybe censoring threads isn't the
best way forward and that surely isn't a message agreed within the board.
While there haven't been yet clear answers that can bring a solution, at
least we all have a clearer view on how LOOL came to be, evolved
Hi Thorsten, all,
it's of course legit to ask people contributing here to comply with the
ML netiquette but I don't think closing the thread here is the solution.
In my opening message sent on January 9th I made a proposal consisting
of four points as an alternative approach to the current
