On 26/02/2022 08:10, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Please take also into account as there was mentioned if someone else like from
China want to engage for the sake of TDF would be hindered to contribute by
If I can make a recommendation, create a list of specific criteria that
will result in
On 2020/07/25 07:58, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> for those who complains about LibreOffice campains stating free (like
> free beer), here is a current example from the official LibreOffice account:
>
> https://twitter.com/libreoffice/status/128692953570496/photo/1
Both "No Registration" and "No
On 2020/07/16 10:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I think TDF marketing should provide guidance on how running a successful
> major
> LibreOffice deployment without external support is set up, and what benefits
> this yields.
Back in the days of OOo 1.x, there was a document describing how to
On 2020/07/16 10:04, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I think TDF marketing should provide guidance on how running a successful
> major
> LibreOffice deployment without external support is set up, and what benefits
> this yields.
Back in the days of OOo 1.x, there was a document describing how to
On 2020/07/17 16:22, Mark Hung wrote:
> My impression as a user regarding LibreOffice Personal ( or Individuals,
> Individuals WFH, students ) vs LibreOffice Enterprises is that they might
> be different in their features, where LibreOffice Enterprise might have a
> bunch of features that suits
On 2020/07/15 17:47, Kev M wrote:
>Your branding expert is possibly correct in their assessment that Personal is
>better. But alarms are going off in the heads of me and other FOSS
>supporters/ideologues on the implications of the term. Hard to balance
>interests.
The hardest part of
On 2020/07/14 10:41, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 20:32, toki wrote:
>> On 2020/07/08 12:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>> I think Thorsten stated more cleanly as:
>>>
>>> "The market for desktop libreoffice is tough;
>>> sales cy
On 2020/07/13 14:20, Telesto wrote:
>The potential customer has to figure out who to contact themselves. Sending
>customers more or less in the dark.
I'll grant that the LibO webpage on obtaining professional, paid
support, could be clearer. From my perspective, the biggest change to
that page
On 2020/07/12 22:59, Tuomas Hietala wrote:
> The big issue I'd like to bring up is that the assumptions behind the
> marketing plan and Michael's analysis seem to be somewhat anglo/eurocentric,
> or perhaps more accurately global north / major language centric".
That is because historically:
On 2020/07/13 12:36, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I think I've detected the location of the bug already.
>
>> and that AOo and LibO are slowly migrating towards
>> mutual incompatibility.
>
> I expect that this is a matter of keeping up with standards. It takes
> significant investment to
On 2020/07/08 11:08, gerry wrote:
> There is no such thing as a homogenous "enterprise" that leads to a certain
> level of software support services needs or that is per se 'suitable' for
> purchased licenses. If the marketing plan is based on wrong assumptions, then
> it might be
On 2020/07/09 16:56, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM Andreas Mantke wrote:
>
>>
>> please read through the whole discussion and you may get an impression
>> that there are some intent to use TDF for such a promotion.
>>
>
> However, those with that impression are entirely
On 2020/07/10 12:59, Kev M wrote:
> Why not call it LibreOffice Vanilla?
I might be hypersensative right now, due to the riots in the United
States, but I suspect every HR department seeking to reduce "hostile
work environment" lawsuits would flat out bar the use of any product
that contained
On 2020/07/08 12:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
> One clarification since it caused some private questions:
>
> On 07/07/2020 21:13, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> Collabora - despite C'bra still putting a lot of work into
>> LibreOffice Desktop, having an outstanding support capability, doing
>> lots of
On 2020/07/09 16:54, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 7/9/20 6:35 PM, Aravind Palla wrote:
>
>> - that there will be no change of license;
>
> Based on what you assume there can be a change of license, the marketing
> plan says exactly the opposite, i.e. we do stay loyal to the copyleft
> license,
On 5/22/20 8:05 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> I disagree. It's a myth. Yes, it can be hard, when firewalls, load
> balancers, 5 users etc. are involved. It's the case when one needs
> professional support. But for the hobbyist, how hard is it to install
> CODE with a few clicks in Univention, or
On 5/26/20 1:51 PM, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 15:43, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>> Paolo Vecchi wrote:
>>> 6 As individual users would you like to make a donation to TDF
>>> specifically to support the development of LibreOffice Online?
>>>
>> We can't do that.
> Is that a technical
On 02/11/2015 16:38, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> 1. Do you commit yourself to have enough time and the necessary
> technological tools in order to participate to the regularly scheduled
> board calls?
Can you be more specific with what you mean by "necessary technological
tools"?
By way of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 04:18 PM, David Nelson wrote:
suggested to her to take team leadership of the LibreOffice docs teamI
two times in the past. But she's very much occupied with odfauthors.
Need I point out that Jean has been running OOoAuthors for the
19 matches
Mail list logo
