Hi Daniel,
thanks for your reply. I'll add issues to the project thus you (and
other volunteers) could look for suitable tasks.
Best,
Andreas
Am 30.08.22 um 23:25 schrieb Daniel A. Rodriguez:
Oh, I had not understood it that way. If so, count me in.
El 30/8/22 a las 13:01, Andreas Mantke
Oh, I had not understood it that way. If so, count me in.
El 30/8/22 a las 13:01, Andreas Mantke escribió:
Hi Daniel,
I think there is wide field of tasks available, not only tasks for
hacking on source code. And also doing smaller task will help to drive
the project forward.
Best,
Andreas
Hi Daniel,
I think there is wide field of tasks available, not only tasks for
hacking on source code. And also doing smaller task will help to drive
the project forward.
Best,
Andreas
Am 29.08.22 um 21:59 schrieb Daniel A. Rodriguez:
I wish I could but, unfortunately, that task is out of my
I wish I could but, unfortunately, that task is out of my scope.
However, it's important to highlight that there's an ongoing work.
El 29 de agosto de 2022 3:02:33 p. m. GMT-03:00, Andreas Mantke
escribió:
>Hi Daniel, hi all,
>
>Am 29.08.22 um 14:51 schrieb drodrig...@libreoffice.org:
>> El
Hi Daniel, hi all,
Am 29.08.22 um 14:51 schrieb drodrig...@libreoffice.org:
El 29.08.2022 07:44, Mike Saunders escribió:
Hi all,
We still have this page on the site:
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-online/
...which has been the same for a very long time. We could update it
El 29.08.2022 07:44, Mike Saunders escribió:
Hi all,
We still have this page on the site:
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-online/
...which has been the same for a very long time. We could update it to
say that we're considering the future of LOOL (linking to this mailing
list
Hi all,
We still have this page on the site:
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-online/
...which has been the same for a very long time. We could update it to
say that we're considering the future of LOOL (linking to this mailing
list post), and see if people are interested in
Hi Paolo, all,
Am 02.08.22 um 11:34 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
Hi Andreas,
thanks for keeping us up to date.
On 30/07/2022 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Here are the 'numbers' for July, 2022:
- 1 volunteer
- work done: small css fix and a typo fix in a markdown file.
Any progress on your
Hi Andreas,
thanks for keeping us up to date.
On 30/07/2022 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Here are the 'numbers' for July, 2022:
- 1 volunteer
- work done: small css fix and a typo fix in a markdown file.
Any progress on your version of LOOL?
Is there a repository where the community can
Hi all,
although the July, 2022 is not finished yet, a short update on the
amount of volunteer contributors to the fork of LibreOffice Online:
Am 07.07.22 um 20:54 schrieb Andreas Mantke:
(...)
So lets have a look on the commits of the last four month of the fork
(without the localization
Hi all,
Am 07.07.22 um 23:05 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
> (...)
>> The last part of this 'communication strategy' reached me in private on
>> July, 3rd at 7.29pm, when I was told that I should contribute objective
>> reason / points to the debate around LOOL and the decision about its
>>
El 07.07.2022 22:12, Paolo Vecchi escribió:
Hi Daniel,
On 07/07/2022 22:04, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
The long arm of the supervisor reaches several of us who dared to
support the proposal to reopen the repo. In my case, trying to point
out what can be said and what cannot.
That's not good
Hi Andreas,
On 07/07/2022 20:54, Andreas Mantke wrote:
It's odd you say that as IIRC Mr Meeks said that since they move the
project to Microsoft GitHub they had more contributors.
Are you by any chance able to substantiate your statement?
I made a short research on the commits of about the
El 7 de julio de 2022 6:05:49 p. m. GMT-03:00, Thorsten Behrens
escribió:
>Hi Andreas, all,
>
>[changing the subject to reflect the discussion character]
>
>Andreas Mantke wrote:
>> >> it is very interesting to read this criteria and compare it with the git
>> >> log of COOL. It seemed even
Hi Daniel,
On 07/07/2022 22:04, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
The long arm of the supervisor reaches several of us who dared to support the
proposal to reopen the repo. In my case, trying to point out what can be said
and what cannot.
That's not good at all.
Have you received these types of
Hi Andreas, all,
[changing the subject to reflect the discussion character]
Andreas Mantke wrote:
> >> it is very interesting to read this criteria and compare it with the git
> >> log of COOL. It seemed even this Github repo (project) didn't attract
> >> the number of volunteers, which are
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 06/07/2022 22:46:
It's odd you say that as IIRC Mr Meeks said that since they move the
What is the use of writing "Mr Meeks" please?
It looks a bit odd to me, in a community where we simply say e.g.
"Paolo". Or of course in case people possibly may not
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Mantke wrote on 06/07/2022 20:08:
[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Policies/Attic#Deatticization_requirements
it is very interesting to read this criteria and compare it with the git
log of COOL. It seemed even this Github repo (project) didn't attract
the
El 7 de julio de 2022 3:54:59 p. m. GMT-03:00, Andreas Mantke
escribió:
>Hi Paolo, all,
>
>although I have not too much spare time for a research I try to answer
>your questions.
>
>
>Am 06.07.22 um 22:46 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> On 06/07/2022 20:08, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Paolo, all,
although I have not too much spare time for a research I try to answer
your questions.
Am 06.07.22 um 22:46 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 06/07/2022 20:08, Andreas Mantke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Am 04.07.22 um 03:11 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
>>> Dear community,
>>>
Hi Andreas,
On 06/07/2022 20:08, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi all,
Am 04.07.22 um 03:11 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Dear community,
the following vote happened after our Monday board call, on request as
a private email vote:
The board sees positive & constructive news around renewed
developer
Hi all,
Am 04.07.22 um 03:11 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
> Dear community,
>
> the following vote happened after our Monday board call, on request as
> a private email vote:
>
>> The board sees positive & constructive news around renewed
>> developer interest in LibreOffice Online. To further
El 04.07.2022 06:39, Paolo Vecchi escribió:
Dear community,
for the record my rejection of the proposal as formulated has not been
counted.
I repeatedly asked for various elements to be considered and to amend
the text before being able to vote on it but that unfortunately hasn't
happened.
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 04/07/2022 11:39:
Dear community,
for the record my rejection of the proposal as formulated has not been
counted.
You did not participate in the vote. Full stop.
I repeatedly asked for various elements to be considered and to amend
the text before being
Dear community,
for the record my rejection of the proposal as formulated has not been
counted.
I repeatedly asked for various elements to be considered and to amend
the text before being able to vote on it but that unfortunately hasn't
happened.
My opinion is that the text doesn't take
Dear community,
the following vote happened after our Monday board call, on request as
a private email vote:
> The board sees positive & constructive news around renewed
> developer interest in LibreOffice Online. To further encourage
> initiatives to collaborate on a single, TDF-hosted
26 matches
Mail list logo
