On 2020/07/09 16:54, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> On 7/9/20 6:35 PM, Aravind Palla wrote:
>
>> - that there will be no change of license;
>
> Based on what you assume there can be a change of license, the marketing
> plan says exactly the opposite, i.e. we do stay loyal to the copyleft
> license,
Thanks for clarifying.
Speculations arise when there is uncertainty. The proposal for two different
editions is an unexpected and unprecedented move.
The word 'personal' is not same in "personal computer" and "personal edition".
Personal computer can be used in offices, but is "forbidden",
I think a clear-cut statement from the Board can answer a lot of questions and
reduce a lot of negativity.
The Board should clarify:
- that there will be no change of license;
- that there will be no 'exclusive' features for the proposed enterprise
edition other than dedicated support like
Hi Paolo,
I think as stated earlier, as part of the consultation regarding the marketing
plan there should be a discussion around tag names. Collectively calling the
ecosystem "Enterprise" has connotations of different editions, even if it's
stated that there will be no difference in versions.
I am sorry Simon, and sorry to whoever else was offended by my ageist/crude
language.
What I was trying to communicate is that Gen Z developers have low interest in
looking at Gerrit, Bugzilla, Mailing Lists, or AskBot if there are projects
that are using modern, visually pleasing and easier
Hi Kev,
thanks for your feedback and see inline my comments.
On 09/07/2020 19:41, Kev M wrote:
> It would be better to call it "LibreOffice Unsupported" and
> "LibreOffice Paid Support" instead of using the terms "LibreOffice
> Enterprise" and "LibreOffice Personal".
Note that we are talking
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 18:47 Kev M, wrote:
>
> To point to links and mailing lists that anyone under the age of 40
> probably does not use regularly
>
This kind of discriminatory language is not called for, does not help and I
am asking for it not to be repeated please.
Thanks,
Simon
>
It would be better to call it "LibreOffice Unsupported" and "LibreOffice Paid
Support" instead of using the terms "LibreOffice Enterprise" and "LibreOffice
Personal".
You're arguing that using the term "community" creates confusion because of
other open source projects providing the same
On 7/9/20 6:35 PM, Aravind Palla wrote:
> - that there will be no change of license;
Based on what you assume there can be a change of license, the marketing
plan says exactly the opposite, i.e. we do stay loyal to the copyleft
license, which is one of the pillars of the project.
> - that there
Thanks Aravind for summarising all we have been saying in the past few
days :-)
All you stated was written or implicit in our communication:
https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2020/07/06/board-statement-on-the-libreoffice-7-0rc-personal-edition-label/
Linking here some of my answers which
Hi Alex,
On 06/07/2020 10:27, Alexander Werner wrote in bugzilla at
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134486#c23
> Cleary, The Document Foundation must release a version that is open
> to all intended audiences. As clearly stated in the statues, the
> intended audience is:
11 matches
Mail list logo
